Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.

Rosenkrantz AB, Triolo MJ, Melamed J, Rusinek H, Taneja SS, Deng FM.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Mar;41(3):708-14. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24598. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

2.

Prostate Cancer: Utility of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Metrics for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.

Rosenkrantz AB, Ream JM, Nolan P, Rusinek H, Deng FM, Taneja SS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Dec;205(6):1208-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14482.

3.

Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.

Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, Vargas HA, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Hricak H, Akin O.

Radiology. 2014 Apr;271(1):143-52. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130973. Epub 2013 Dec 12. Erratum in: Radiology. 2014 Oct;273(1):311.

PMID:
24475824
4.

Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.

De Cobelli F, Ravelli S, Esposito A, Giganti F, Gallina A, Montorsi F, Del Maschio A.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):550-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13146.

PMID:
25714284
5.

Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.

Rozenberg R, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, Hakim SW, Lim C, Schieda N.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):775-82. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15462. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

PMID:
27003049
6.

Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores.

Wibmer A, Hricak H, Gondo T, Matsumoto K, Veeraraghavan H, Fehr D, Zheng J, Goldman D, Moskowitz C, Fine SW, Reuter VE, Eastham J, Sala E, Vargas HA.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):2840-50. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8. Epub 2015 May 21.

PMID:
25991476
7.

Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.

Roethke MC, Kuder TA, Kuru TH, Fenchel M, Hadaschik BA, Laun FB, Schlemmer HP, Stieltjes B.

Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.

PMID:
25867657
8.

Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer gleason score at final pathology.

Boesen L, Chabanova E, Løgager V, Balslev I, Thomsen HS.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):446-53. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24801. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

PMID:
25408104
9.

Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, van Oort IM, Witjes JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Scheenen T, Barentsz JO.

Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):453-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091409.

PMID:
21502392
10.

Utility of diffusional kurtosis imaging as a marker of adverse pathologic outcomes among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Rosenkrantz AB, Prabhu V, Sigmund EE, Babb JS, Deng FM, Taneja SS.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Oct;201(4):840-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10397.

PMID:
24059373
11.

Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy.

Verma S, Rajesh A, Morales H, Lemen L, Bills G, Delworth M, Gaitonde K, Ying J, Samartunga R, Lamba M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):374-81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4441.

PMID:
21257890
12.

Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason Grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours.

Bittencourt LK, Barentsz JO, de Miranda LC, Gasparetto EL.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):468-75. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2269-1. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

PMID:
21913058
13.

Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.

Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T, Mazaheri Y, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Udo K, Eastham J, Hricak H.

Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):775-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102066. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

14.

The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.

Nowak J, Malzahn U, Baur AD, Reichelt U, Franiel T, Hamm B, Durmus T.

Acta Radiol. 2016 Jan;57(1):107-14. doi: 10.1177/0284185114561915. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

PMID:
25505225
15.

Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.

Gondo T, Hricak H, Sala E, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Bernstein M, Eastham JA, Vargas HA.

Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3161-70. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3367-7. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

PMID:
25100337
16.

Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Rosenkrantz AB, Kopec M, Kong X, Melamed J, Dakwar G, Babb JS, Taouli B.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1387-94. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22172.

PMID:
20512891
17.

Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience.

Park SY, Kim CK, Park JJ, Park BK.

Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1058):20150470. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150470. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

PMID:
26653866
18.

Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.

Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, Babb JS, Mussi TC, Melamed J, Taneja SS, Lee VS, Jensen JH.

Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):126-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112290. Epub 2012 May 1.

PMID:
22550312
19.

Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study.

Lim HK, Kim JK, Kim KA, Cho KS.

Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):145-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2501080207. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

PMID:
19017927
20.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Lista F, Gimbernat H, Cáceres F, Rodríguez-Barbero JM, Castillo E, Angulo JC.

Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Jun;38(5):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.11.003. Epub 2014 Jan 1. English, Spanish.

PMID:
24387827
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk