Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

The effects of welfare-enhancing system changes on the environmental impacts of broiler and egg production.

Leinonen I, Williams AG, Kyriazakis I.

Poult Sci. 2014 Feb;93(2):256-66. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03252.

PMID:
24570446
2.

Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems.

Leinonen I, Williams AG, Wiseman J, Guy J, Kyriazakis I.

Poult Sci. 2012 Jan;91(1):26-40. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01635.

PMID:
22184425
3.

Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: broiler production systems.

Leinonen I, Williams AG, Wiseman J, Guy J, Kyriazakis I.

Poult Sci. 2012 Jan;91(1):8-25. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01634.

PMID:
22184424
4.

Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment.

Dourmad JY, Ryschawy J, Trousson T, Bonneau M, Gonzàlez J, Houwers HW, Hviid M, Zimmer C, Nguyen TL, Morgensen L.

Animal. 2014 Dec;8(12):2027-37. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002134. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

PMID:
25170767
5.

Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems.

Xin H, Gates RS, Green AR, Mitloehner FM, Moore PA Jr, Wathes CM.

Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):263-77. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00877. Review.

PMID:
21177468
6.

How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?

Leinonen I, Kyriazakis I.

Proc Nutr Soc. 2016 Mar 3:1-9. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26935025
7.

Comparison of the environmental footprint of the egg industry in the United States in 1960 and 2010.

Pelletier N, Ibarburu M, Xin H.

Poult Sci. 2014 Feb;93(2):241-55. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03390.

PMID:
24570445
8.

Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.

Mench JA, Sumner DA, Rosen-Molina JT.

Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):229-40. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00844.

PMID:
21177465
9.

Environmental aspects of ethical animal production.

Siegford JM, Powers W, Grimes-Casey HG.

Poult Sci. 2008 Feb;87(2):380-6. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00351.

PMID:
18212385
10.

Potential environmental benefits of prospective genetic changes in broiler traits.

Leinonen I, Williams AG, Kyriazakis I.

Poult Sci. 2016 Feb;95(2):228-36. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev323. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

PMID:
26628347
11.

Poultry housing and husbandry.

Elson HA.

Br Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;51 Suppl 1:23-34. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.497300. Review.

PMID:
20711899
12.

Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.

Nguyen TT, Doreau M, Eugène M, Corson MS, Garcia-Launay F, Chesneau G, van der Werf HM.

Animal. 2013 May;7(5):860-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002200. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

PMID:
23190866
13.

Development of furnished cages for laying hens.

Appleby MC, Walker AW, Nicol CJ, Lindberg AC, Freire R, Hughes BO, Elson HA.

Br Poult Sci. 2002 Sep;43(4):489-500.

PMID:
12365505
14.

Review: welfare perspectives on hens kept for egg production.

Craig JV, Swanson JC.

Poult Sci. 1994 Jul;73(7):921-38. Review.

PMID:
7937480
15.

Introduction--the Socially Sustainable Egg Production project.

Swanson JC, Mench JA, Thompson PB.

Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):227-8. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01266.

PMID:
21177464
16.

Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density.

Dawkins MS, Donnelly CA, Jones TA.

Nature. 2004 Jan 22;427(6972):342-4.

PMID:
14737165
17.

Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.

Sumner DA, Gow H, Hayes D, Matthews W, Norwood B, Rosen-Molina JT, Thurman W.

Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):241-50. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00822.

PMID:
21177466
18.

Intensive production units and welfare: domestic fowl.

Blokhuis HJ.

Rev Sci Tech. 1994 Mar;13(1):67-78. Review.

PMID:
8173103
19.

Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.

Mackenzie SG, Leinonen I, Ferguson N, Kyriazakis I.

J Anim Sci. 2015 Jun;93(6):3130-43. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8403.

20.

The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs.

Taylor RC, Omed H, Edwards-Jones G.

Poult Sci. 2014 Jan;93(1):231-7. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03489.

PMID:
24570444
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk