Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 162

1.

Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?

Reed EA, Dalton H, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Gaya DR, Cahill A, Warshow U, Hare N, Groome M, Forrest EH, Morris J, Stanley AJ.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;26(4):432-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000051.

PMID:
24535596
2.

Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.

Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

PMID:
23790755
3.

Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Stanley AJ, Dalton HR, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Cahill A, Gaya DR, Thompson E, Warshow U, Hare N, Groome M, Benson G, Murray W.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;34(4):470-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04747.x. Epub 2011 Jun 26.

4.

Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.

Aquarius M, Smeets FG, Konijn HW, Stassen PM, Keulen ET, Van Deursen CT, Masclee AA, Keulemans YC.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;27(9):1011-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000402.

PMID:
26049709
5.

Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.

Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, Mowat C, Gaya DR, Thompson E, Warshow U, Groome M, Cahill A, Benson G, Blatchford O, Murray W.

Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):42-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61769-9. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

PMID:
19091393
6.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage.

Lahiff C, Shields W, Cretu I, Mahmud N, McKiernan S, Norris S, Silke B, Reynolds JV, O'Toole D.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;24(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834e37d6.

PMID:
22113209
7.

Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.

Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12554. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

8.

Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?

Le Jeune IR, Gordon AL, Farrugia D, Manwani R, Guha IN, James MW.

Acute Med. 2011;10(4):176-81.

PMID:
22111089
9.

Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT.

Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9.

PMID:
17870480
10.

Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Bozkurt S, Köse A, Arslan ED, Erdoğan S, Üçbilek E, Çevik İ, Ayrık C, Sezgin O.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 30;23:109. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0194-z.

11.

Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Wang CY, Qin J, Wang J, Sun CY, Cao T, Zhu DD.

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 14;19(22):3466-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3466.

12.

Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Ahn S, Lim KS, Lee YS, Lee JL.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Aug;28(8):1288-94. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12179.

PMID:
23432611
13.

Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.

Dicu D, Pop F, Ionescu D, Dicu T.

Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

PMID:
23000328
14.

A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Wang CH, Chen YW, Young YR, Yang CJ, Chen IC.

Am J Emerg Med. 2013 May;31(5):775-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

PMID:
23465874
15.

A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.

Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;36(8):782-9. doi: 10.1111/apt.12029. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

17.

Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.

Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

PMID:
26515955
18.

Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Thanapirom K, Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, Thungsuk R, Noophun P, Wongjitrat C, Luangjaru S, Vedkijkul P, Lertkupinit C, Poonsab S, Ratanachu-Ek T, Hansomburana P, Pornthisarn B, Thongbai T, Mahachai V, Treeprasertsuk S.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222.

PMID:
26514879
19.

External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting.

Chandra S, Hess EP, Agarwal D, Nestler DM, Montori VM, Song LM, Wells GA, Stiell IG.

Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):673-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.03.010.

PMID:
21641145
20.

Model for end stage of liver disease (MELD) is better than the Child-Pugh score for predicting in-hospital mortality related to esophageal variceal bleeding.

Flores-Rendón AR, González-González JA, García-Compean D, Maldonado-Garza HJ, Garza-Galindo AA.

Ann Hepatol. 2008 Jul-Sep;7(3):230-4.

PMID:
18753990
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk