Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 145

1.

Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults.

Gygi B, Shafiro V.

Hear Res. 2014 Apr;310:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

PMID:
24530609
2.

Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(7):616-34. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.7.10.

3.

Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?

Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1542-58. doi: 10.1121/1.3608122.

PMID:
21895093
4.

Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.

Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.

PMID:
22343546
5.

Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Helfer KS, Chevalier J, Freyman RL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Dec;128(6):3625-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3502462.

6.

Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing.

Humes LE, Coughlin M.

Scand J Psychol. 2009 Oct;50(5):485-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00740.x.

7.

The advantage of knowing the talker.

Souza P, Gehani N, Wright R, McCloy D.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep;24(8):689-700. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.6.

8.
9.

Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.

Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.

Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.

PMID:
21233711
10.

The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Marrone N, Mason CR, Kidd G Jr.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Nov;124(5):3064-75. doi: 10.1121/1.2980441.

11.

Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Xia J, Nooraei N, Kalluri S, Edwards B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Apr;137(4):1888-98. doi: 10.1121/1.4916599.

PMID:
25920841
12.

Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task.

Brungart DS, Kordik AJ, Simpson BD.

Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):562-73.

PMID:
16435697
13.

What does successful speech-in-noise perception in aging depend on? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in older adults.

Getzmann S, Wascher E, Falkenstein M.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

PMID:
25681737
14.

Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.

Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA.

Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):711-21. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829bf6ec.

PMID:
24165300
15.

Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.

Desjardins JL, Doherty KA.

Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):261-72. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0ba4.

PMID:
23095723
16.

Cognitive resources related to speech recognition with a competing talker in young and older listeners.

Meister H, Schreitmüller S, Grugel L, Ortmann M, Beutner D, Walger M, Meister IG.

Neuroscience. 2013 Mar 1;232:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.006. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

PMID:
23246616
18.

Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability.

Harris KC, Eckert MA, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.

Hear Res. 2010 Jun 1;264(1-2):21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.017. Epub 2009 Oct 2.

19.

Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition.

Humes LE, Lee JH, Coughlin MP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Nov;120(5 Pt 1):2926-37.

PMID:
17139749
20.

Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.

Gosselin PA, Gagné JP.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Nov;50(11):786-92. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.599870. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

PMID:
21916790
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk