Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

The POP-Q system: two decades of progress and debate.

Bump RC.

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):441-3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2262-0. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

PMID:
24504065
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward.

Riss P, Dwyer PL.

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):439-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2311-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
24504067
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

POP-Q stage I prolapse: is it time to alter our terminology?

Toozs-Hobson P, Swift S.

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):445-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2260-2. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

PMID:
24504064
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

POP-Q 2.0: its time has come!

Harmanli O.

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):447-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2252-2. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

PMID:
24504063
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.

Stark D, Dall P, Abdel-Fattah M, Hagen S.

Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jun;21(6):651-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1. Epub 2010 Jan 27.

PMID:
20107767
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

The effect of episiotomy on pelvic organ prolapse assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.

Aytan H, Tok EC, Ertunc D, Yasa O.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Feb;173:34-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

PMID:
24314799
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging.

Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P.

J Med Life. 2011 Jan-Mar;4(1):75-81. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

PMID:
21505577
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

A novel approach to teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) exam.

Parnell BA, Dunivan GC, Geller EJ, Connolly A.

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):367-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1299-6. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

PMID:
20960151
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Accuracy of assessing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Lone FW, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Stankiewicz A.

Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1555-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1779-y. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

PMID:
22543548
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

"Eyeball" POP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool?

Karp DR, Peterson TV, Jean-Michel M, Lefevre R, Davila GW, Aguilar VC.

Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Aug;21(8):1005-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1139-8. Epub 2010 May 4.

PMID:
20440479
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.

Lakeman MM, Zijta FM, Peringa J, Nederveen AJ, Stoker J, Roovers JP.

Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1547-54. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1772-5. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

PMID:
22531955
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Urogynaecology: my view.

Stanton S.

Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb;23(2):141-3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1472-6. Epub 2011 Sep 24. No abstract available.

PMID:
21947017
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Correlating signs and symptoms with pubovisceral muscle avulsions on magnetic resonance imaging.

Lammers K, Fütterer JJ, Inthout J, Prokop M, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):148.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.006. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

PMID:
23220507
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent.

Dietz HP, Mann KP.

Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):451-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2307-4. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

PMID:
24504066
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

My fifty-year odyssey in obstetrics and gynecology.

Loring TW.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1244-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
9215180
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification use in the literature.

Oyama IA, Steinberg AC, Watai TK, Minaglia SM.

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):35-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823bd1ab. Review.

PMID:
22453265
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Index (POP-Q-I): a novel interpretation of the POP-Q system for optimization of POP research.

Lemos NL, Auge AP, Lunardelli JL, Carramão Sda S, Faria AL, Aoki T.

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jul;19(7):995-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0556-9. Epub 2008 Jan 24.

PMID:
18217176
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The effect of bladder fullness on evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse.

Haya N, Segev E, Younes G, Goldschmidt E, Auslender R, Abramov Y.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jul;118(1):24-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Apr 14.

PMID:
22507262
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Genetics of pelvic organ prolapse: crossing the bridge between bench and bedside in urogynecologic research.

Bortolini MA, Rizk DE.

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Oct;22(10):1211-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1502-4. Epub 2011 Jul 26. Review.

PMID:
21789659
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The Green Journal, 50 years on.

[No authors listed]

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1 Suppl):1-200. No abstract available.

PMID:
12530455
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk