Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 150

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24503689)

1.

Comparative effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty versus French-door laminoplasty in cervical compressive myelopathy.

Nakashima H, Kato F, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Ito K, Machino M, Ishiguro N.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):642-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000252.

PMID:
24503689
2.

A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or French-door laminoplasty.

Okada M, Minamide A, Endo T, Yoshida M, Kawakami M, Ando M, Hashizume H, Nakagawa Y, Maio K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c3b61.

PMID:
19444058
3.

Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.

Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee JH, Lee SH, Lim YJ, Kim JS.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 1;32(23):E656-60.

PMID:
17978640
4.

Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.

Lee DG, Lee SH, Park SJ, Kim ES, Chung SS, Lee CS, Eoh W.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):E198-203. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828bb296.

PMID:
23511650
5.

[Discussion of surgical indications for posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty extended to C1 level].

Li Q, Kong Q, Zhang L, Sun T, Li T, Gong Q, Song Y, Liu H.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1214-20. Chinese.

PMID:
24397134
6.

Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, Hirabayashi K.

Spine J. 2001 Jan-Feb;1(1):26-30.

PMID:
14588365
7.

Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.

Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Ito Z, Matsuyama Y.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 15;32(18):1980-5.

PMID:
17700444
8.
9.

Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty.

Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M, Arai Y, Kawabata S, Enomoto M, Kato T, Hirai T, Shinomiya K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):367-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821f4a51.

PMID:
21540774
10.

Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty?

Kim SW, Hai DM, Sundaram S, Kim YC, Park MS, Paik SH, Kwak YH, Kim TH.

Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):914-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

PMID:
23541454
11.

A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Otani K, Sato K, Yabuki S, Iwabuchi M, Kikuchi S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):268-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195b27a.

PMID:
19179921
12.

Skip laminectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes.

Sivaraman A, Bhadra AK, Altaf F, Singh A, Rai A, Casey AT, Crawford RJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):96-100. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318198c92a.

PMID:
20084024
13.

Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study.

Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Shoji H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 20;37(9):748-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326957.

PMID:
21912316
14.

Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis.

Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1168-75.

PMID:
12045513
15.

Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Naruse T, Yanase M, Takahashi H, Horie Y, Ito M, Imaizumi T, Oguri K, Matsuyama Y.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 15;34(24):2634-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b46c00.

PMID:
19910766
16.

Influence of hinge position on the effectiveness of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Xia Y, Xia Y, Shen Q, Li H, Xu T.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Dec;24(8):514-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182064632.

PMID:
21336170
17.
18.

Decompressive laminoplasty in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy: bilateral cutting versus open-door technique.

Asgari S, Bassiouni H, Massoud N, Schlamann M, Stolke D, Sandalcioglu IE.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Jul;151(7):739-49; discussion 749. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0343-0. Epub 2009 May 13.

PMID:
19436951
19.

Treatment of myelopathy due to cervicothoracic OPLL via open door laminoplasty.

Komagata M, Inahata Y, Nishiyama M, Endo K, Tanaka H, Kobayashi H.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Jul;20(5):342-6.

PMID:
17607097
20.

Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, Jin A.

Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):362-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3043-7. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Review.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk