Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 154

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24496417)

1.

The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy.

Menees SB, Elliott E, Govani S, Anastassiades C, Judd S, Urganus A, Boyce S, Schoenfeld P.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):148-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.243.

2.

The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Menees SB, Kim HM, Elliott EE, Mickevicius JL, Graustein BB, Schoenfeld PS.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):510-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.1334. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

3.

Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Colditz GA, Early DS, Wang JS.

Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Aug;58(8):2151-5. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2642-9. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

PMID:
23535876
4.

MiraLAX-Gatorade bowel prep versus GoLytely before screening colonoscopy: an endoscopic database study in a community hospital.

Shieh FK, Gunaratnam N, Mohamud SO, Schoenfeld P.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov-Dec;46(10):e96-e100. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182617bfb.

5.

Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy.

Menees SB, Elliott E, Govani S, Anastassiades C, Schoenfeld P.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr;79(4):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.029.

6.

Should the quality of preparation impact postcolonoscopy follow-up recommendations?

Bond JH.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2686-7.

PMID:
18042104
7.

The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations.

Larsen M, Hills N, Terdiman J.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec;106(12):2058-62. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.238.

PMID:
22138933
8.

The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy.

Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2680-5. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

PMID:
17714555
9.

The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.

Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

10.

An evaluation of colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: are we actually adhering to the guidelines?

Walker AS, Nelson DW, Fowler JJ, Causey MW, Quade S, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Steele SR.

Am J Surg. 2013 May;205(5):618-22; discussion 622. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.12.006.

PMID:
23592173
11.

Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

PMID:
22381531
12.

Screening patterns in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer often do not adhere to national guidelines.

Lin OS, Gluck M, Nguyen M, Koch J, Kozarek RA.

Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jul;58(7):1841-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2567-3. Epub 2013 Jan 31.

PMID:
23371014
13.

Chronic methadone use, poor bowel visualization and failed colonoscopy: a preliminary study.

Verma S, Fogel J, Beyda DJ, Bernstein B, Notar-Francesco V, Mohanty SR.

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4350-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4350.

14.

Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey.

Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Lebwohl B, Basch CE, Kastrinos F, Insel BJ, Neugut AI.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1559-7. Epub 2012 Aug 12.

15.

Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates.

Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, van Baalen O, Kubben FJ, Moolenaar W, Stolk MF, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME; SCoPE consortium.

Endoscopy. 2013 Jul;45(7):545-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326359. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

PMID:
23580411
16.

What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.

Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.232. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Review.

17.

Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice.

Halphen M, Heresbach D, Gruss HJ, Belsey J.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 24.

PMID:
23531426
18.

Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.

Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
25239068
19.

Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.

Krist AH, Jones RM, Woolf SH, Woessner SE, Merenstein D, Kerns JW, Foliaco W, Jackson P.

Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):471-8.

PMID:
18022063
20.

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O'brien MJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Levin TR, Bond JH, Brooks D, Byers T, Hyman N, Kirk L, Thorson A, Simmang C, Johnson D, Rex DK.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 May-Jun;56(3):143-59; quiz 184-5.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk