Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 118

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24495679)

1.

[Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].

Leng X, Wang M, Zhang SL, Wang D, Cao W, Yang XH.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;48(12):891-5. Chinese.

PMID:
24495679
2.

Adequacy of the endometrial samples obtained by the uterine explora device and conventional dilatation and curettage: a comparative study.

Arafah MA, Cherkess Al-Rikabi A, Aljasser R, Adi Y.

Int J Reprod Med. 2014;2014:578193. doi: 10.1155/2014/578193. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

3.

Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.

Rauf R, Shaheen A, Sadia S, Waqar F, Zafar S, Sultana S, Waseem S.

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Apr-Jun;26(2):145-8.

PMID:
25603664
4.

Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy.

Liu H, Wang FL, Zhao YM, Yao YQ, Li YL.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Dec 31:1-4. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25549755
5.

[Influence of sampling satisfaction using endometrial sampling device and related factors for pathology diagnostic accordance rate].

Zhang T, Zhou R, Liu C, Shen D.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;49(9):655-8. Chinese.

PMID:
25487450
6.

Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy.

Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Ertas IE, Ozdemir IA, Ulker MM, Yildirim G, Ataser G, Sanci M.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(5):539-43.

PMID:
25423700
7.

Evaluation of endometrial cytology: cytohistological correlations in 1,441 cancer patients.

Fujiwara H, Takahashi Y, Takano M, Miyamoto M, Nakamura K, Kaneta Y, Hanaoka T, Ohwada M, Sakamoto T, Hirakawa T, Fujiwara K, Suzuki M.

Oncology. 2015;88(2):86-94. doi: 10.1159/000368162. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

PMID:
25324024
8.

Pipelle endometrial sampling in the evaluation of abnormal first trimester pregnancies.

Batig AL, Elliott D, Rumjahn H, Keylock J, Chinn M, Chow GE.

Mil Med. 2014 Sep;179(9):1030-5. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00569.

PMID:
25181722
9.

Clinical outcomes of patients with insufficient sample from endometrial biopsy or curettage.

Kandil D, Yang X, Stockl T, Liu Y.

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014 Sep;33(5):500-6. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000085.

PMID:
25083966
10.

Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Abdelazim IA, Aboelezz A, Abdulkareem AF.

J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Mar 1;14(1):1-5. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.01. eCollection 2013.

11.

[Application of endometrial sampling device during the follow-up visit for the conservative treatment of endometrial cancer].

Zhou R, Shen DH, Wang CH, Geng J, Wang JL, Wei LH.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;48(12):896-8. Chinese.

PMID:
24495680
12.

[Screening and sampling of endometrial carcinoma accuracy of the endometrial cytology test for the screening of endometrial cancer].

Yang X, Liao QP, Wu C, Zhang NY, Zhao J, Chen R, Zhang N, Ma XH, Gao YN, Gao WL, Zheng H, Zeng Z, Wen J, Dong Y.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;48(12):884-90. Chinese.

PMID:
24495678
13.

[Pertinence of the preoperative exploration in the evaluation of the risk of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer].

Groff B, Pouget O, Stoll F, Mathelin C, Baldauf JJ, Akladios CY.

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Feb;42(2):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Dec 3. French.

PMID:
24309027
14.

The necessity of using tenaculum for endometrial sampling procedure with pipelle: a randomized controlled study.

Kucukgoz Gulec U, Khatib G, Guzel AB, Akil A, Urunsak IF, Ozgunen FT.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3005-7. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

PMID:
23963375
15.

Comparison of dilatation & curettage and endometrial aspiration biopsy accuracy in patients treated with high-dose oral progestin plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer.

Kim MK, Seong SJ, Song T, Kim ML, Yoon BS, Jun HS, Lee GH, Lee YH.

Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):470-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.035. Epub 2013 Jun 30.

PMID:
23822890
16.

Concordance between hysteroscopic impression and endometrial histopathological diagnosis.

Gan DE, Jawan RA, Moy FM.

Prev Med. 2013;57 Suppl:S21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.026. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

PMID:
23313791
17.

Papillary proliferation of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases of simple and complex papillae without cytologic atypia.

Ip PP, Irving JA, McCluggage WG, Clement PB, Young RH.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Feb;37(2):167-77. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318272d428.

PMID:
23211295
18.

Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.

Kazandi M, Okmen F, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Zeybek B, Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Nov;32(8):790-4. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.719944.

PMID:
23075358
19.

Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial curettage in endometrial pathology.

Saadia A, Mubarik A, Zubair A, Jamal S, Zafar A.

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Jan-Mar;23(1):129-31.

PMID:
22830167
20.

Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C).

Demirkiran F, Yavuz E, Erenel H, Bese T, Arvas M, Sanioglu C.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;286(5):1277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2438-8. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

PMID:
22766754
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk