Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 110

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24455069)

1.

Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study.

Singh R, Singh J, Gambhir RS, Singh R, Nanda S.

J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Jul 1;5(3):e138-43. doi: 10.4317/jced.51134. eCollection 2013 Jul 1.

2.

Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.

O'Mahony A, Spencer P, Williams K, Corcoran J.

Quintessence Int. 2000 Mar;31(3):201-6.

PMID:
11203927
3.

Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.

Gerrow JD, Price RB.

J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Oct;80(4):485-9.

PMID:
9791798
4.
5.

Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.

Walker MP, Petrie CS, Haj-Ali R, Spencer P, Dumas C, Williams K.

J Prosthodont. 2005 Sep;14(3):158-63.

PMID:
16336232
6.

Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.

Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Boyacioglu H.

Quintessence Int. 2007 Feb;38(2):e92-8.

PMID:
17510720
7.

Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.

Lampé I, Marton S, Hegedüs C.

Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):590.

PMID:
15543917
8.

Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.

Price RB, Gerrow JD.

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar;83(3):306-13.

PMID:
10709039
9.
10.

Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.

Endo T, Finger WJ.

Quintessence Int. 2006 Jan;37(1):47-51.

PMID:
16429703
11.

Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.

Schelb E, Cavazos E Jr, Troendle KB, Prihoda TJ.

Quintessence Int. 1991 Jan;22(1):51-5.

PMID:
1784720
12.

Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.

de Camargo LM, Chee WW, Donovan TE.

J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):114-7.

PMID:
8371173
13.

Surface detail reproduction with new elastomeric dental impression materials.

Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Komatsu M.

Quintessence Int. 2007 Jun;38(6):479-88.

PMID:
17625631
14.

Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Burgess JO, Mercante D, Hoist S.

Quintessence Int. 2005 Feb;36(2):97-104.

PMID:
15732545
15.

Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.

Dogan S, Schwedhelm ER, Heindl H, Mancl L, Raigrodski AJ.

J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May 12. pii: S0022-3913(15)00184-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.019. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25976708
16.

Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.

Katyayan PA, Kalavathy N, Katyayan M.

Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):881-2. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.94697.

17.

Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.

Nissan J, Gross M, Shifman A, Assif D.

J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Apr;29(4):357-61.

PMID:
11966969
18.

Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.

Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D.

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb;83(2):161-5.

PMID:
10668027
19.

A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.

Kumar S, Yadav D, Yadav R, Arora A.

Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Mar-Apr;25(2):184-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.135916.

20.

Effect of the impression margin thickness on the linear accuracy of impression and stone dies: an in vitro study.

Naveen YG, Patil R.

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Mar;13(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0160-7. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk