Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 140

1.
2.
3.

Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, Donati O, Schnabl J, Falk V, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Cury RC.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(5):540-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961250. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

4.

Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Choo KS, Hwangbo L, Kim JH, Park YH, Kim JS, Kim J, Chun KJ, Jeong DW, Lim SJ.

Acta Radiol. 2013 May;54(4):389-95. doi: 10.1177/0284185113475440. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23550182
5.

Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results.

Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, Fink C, Rowe GW, Costello P, Henzler T.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):3703-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.022. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

PMID:
21194865
6.

Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography.

Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Bezerra HG, Okada DR, Rogers IS, Ghoshhajra B, Hoffmann U, Feuchtner G, Mamuya WS, Brady TJ, Cury RC.

Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):410-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091014.

7.

Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography.

Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, Rocha-Filho JA, Okada DR, Sarwar A, Soni AV, Bezerra H, Ghoshhajra BB, Petranovic M, Loureiro R, Feuchtner G, Gewirtz H, Hoffmann U, Mamuya WS, Brady TJ, Cury RC.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 15;54(12):1072-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014.

8.

Myocardial ischemia evaluation with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Delgado C, Vázquez M, Oca R, Vilar M, Trinidad C, Sanmartin M.

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Nov;66(11):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

PMID:
24773993
10.

Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience.

Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ.

Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):306-13. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa2f2.

PMID:
20421800
11.
12.

Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: direct comparison with cardiovascular MRI.

Ko SM, Song MG, Chee HK, Hwang HK, Feuchtner GM, Min JK.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):W605-13. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12644.

13.

Incremental value of pharmacological stress cardiac dual-energy CT over coronary CT angiography alone for the assessment of coronary artery disease in a high-risk population.

De Cecco CN, Harris BS, Schoepf UJ, Silverman JR, McWhite CB, Krazinski AW, Bayer RR, Meinel FG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul;203(1):W70-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11772.

PMID:
24951230
14.

Dual-energy CT for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: comparison with 3-T MRI.

Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Fischer N, Burkhard T, Larson MC, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):639-46. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3849.

PMID:
20729440
15.

Low-dose CT and cardiac MR for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: accuracy of single and combined approaches.

Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H, Azemaj N, Plass A, Baumueller S, Desbiolles L, Leschka S, Kozerke S, Falk V, Boesiger P, Wyss C, Marincek B, Donati OF.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jun;26(5):579-90. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9595-2. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

PMID:
20146002
16.

Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.

Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Aug;3(8):811-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.05.009.

17.

First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT.

Meinel FG, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Nance JW Jr, Silverman JR, Flowers BA, Henzler T.

Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):708-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131183. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

PMID:
24475833
18.

Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.

Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC, Antonis PR, Nandurkar D, Wong DT, Kyi L, Cameron JD, Troupis JM, Meredith IT, Seneviratne SK.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Jul;23(7):1812-21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2788-z. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

PMID:
23430194
19.

Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, Nasis A, Crossett M, Hope SA, Lehman SJ, Troupis J, DeFrance T, Seneviratne SK.

Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr268. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

20.

Functional assessment of coronary artery flow using adenosine stress dual-energy CT: a preliminary study.

Nagao M, Kido T, Watanabe K, Saeki H, Okayama H, Kurata A, Hosokawa K, Higashino H, Mochizuki T.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Mar;27(3):471-81. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9676-2. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk