Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients.

Udeh BL, Costandi S, Dalton JE, Ghosh R, Yousef H, Mekhail N.

Pain Pract. 2015 Feb;15(2):107-16. doi: 10.1111/papr.12160. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

2.

Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP.

Burnett MG, Stein SC, Bartels RH.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jul;13(1):39-46. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09552. Review.

PMID:
20594016
3.

Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor Regarding "The Two Year Cost Effectiveness of Three Options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients".

Mekail N, Udeh B.

Pain Pract. 2014 Sep;14(7):e163-4. doi: 10.1111/papr.12233. Epub 2014 Aug 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
25124314
4.

Regarding: Udeh BL, et al. The 2-year Cost-effectiveness of 3 Options to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients. Pain Pract 2014 Jan 3 [epub ahead of print].

Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA.

Pain Pract. 2014 Sep;14(7):e161-2. doi: 10.1111/papr.12236. Epub 2014 Aug 12. No abstract available.

PMID:
25113809
5.

Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.

Rampersaud YR, Tso P, Walker KR, Lewis SJ, Davey JR, Mahomed NN, Coyte PC.

Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

PMID:
24239803
6.

Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.

Parker SL, Fulchiero EC, Davis BJ, Adogwa O, Aaronson OS, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

Spine J. 2011 Aug;11(8):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.024. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

PMID:
21641874
7.
8.

Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.

Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, Aaronson O, Cheng JS, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Feb;16(2):135-40. doi: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11308. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

PMID:
22054639
9.

Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.

Adogwa O, Owens R, Karikari I, Agarwal V, Gottfried ON, Bagley CA, Isaacs RE, Cheng JS.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):147-53. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12226. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

PMID:
23231358
10.

Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.

Modhia U, Takemoto S, Braid-Forbes MJ, Weber M, Berven SH.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):591-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5.

PMID:
23324923
11.

Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.

Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, Zuckerman SL, Shau DN, McGirt MJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):143-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE1320. Epub 2014 May 2.

PMID:
24785973
12.

Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis.

Parker SL, Adogwa O, Davis BJ, Fulchiero E, Aaronson O, Cheng J, Devin CJ, McGirt MJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Feb;26(1):42-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318232313d.

PMID:
21959840
13.

Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.

Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Pyo SY, Paulo D, Härtl R.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):339-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

PMID:
25635635
14.

Trends for Spine Surgery for the Elderly: Implications for Access to Healthcare in North America.

O'Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Vasquez-Castellanos RA, Cheng JS.

Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S136-41. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000945. Review.

PMID:
26378351
15.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: therapeutic options review.

Costandi S, Chopko B, Mekhail M, Dews T, Mekhail N.

Pain Pract. 2015 Jan;15(1):68-81. doi: 10.1111/papr.12188. Epub 2014 Apr 12. Review.

PMID:
24725422
16.

Cost Utility Analysis of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Managing Pain of Post-lumbar Surgery Syndrome and Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis.

Manchikanti L, Helm S 2nd, Pampati V, Racz GB.

Pain Pract. 2015 Jun;15(5):414-22. doi: 10.1111/papr.12195. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

PMID:
24666747
17.

Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN, Pope MH, Katz JN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 1;25(9):1132-9.

PMID:
10788859
18.

Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.

Mekhail N, Vallejo R, Coleman MH, Benyamin RM.

Pain Pract. 2012 Mar;12(3):184-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00481.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

PMID:
21676166
19.

MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.

Benyamin RM, Staats PS.

Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):307-16.

20.

Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Lønne G, Johnsen LG, Aas E, Lydersen S, Andresen H, Rønning R, Nygaard ØP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):514-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000798.

PMID:
25608246
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk