Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Chalkley method in the angiogenesis research and its automation via computer simulation.

Karslioğlu Y, Yiğit N, Öngürü Ö.

Pathol Res Pract. 2014 Mar;210(3):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

PMID:
24359720
2.

Quantitation of microvessel density in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by computer-aided image analysis.

Erovic BM, Neuchrist C, Berger U, El-Rabadi K, Burian M.

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005 Jan;117(1-2):53-7.

PMID:
15986592
3.

Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.

Fox SB, Leek RD, Weekes MP, Whitehouse RM, Gatter KC, Harris AL.

J Pathol. 1995 Nov;177(3):275-83.

PMID:
8551390
4.

Prognostic role of microvessel density in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Cheng SH, Liu JM, Liu QY, Luo DY, Liao BH, Li H, Wang KJ.

Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Aug 15;7(9):5855-63. eCollection 2014. Review.

5.

Angiogenesis in breast cancer: a comparative study of the observer variability of methods for determining microvessel density.

Hansen S, Grabau DA, Rose C, Bak M, Sørensen FB.

Lab Invest. 1998 Dec;78(12):1563-73.

PMID:
9881956
6.

Breast carcinoma vascularity: a comparison of manual microvessel count and Chalkley count.

Dhakal HP, Bassarova A, Naume B, Synnestvedt M, Borgen E, Kaaresen R, Schlichting E, Wiedswang G, Giercksky KE, Nesland JM.

Histol Histopathol. 2009 Aug;24(8):1049-59.

PMID:
19554512
7.

The prognostic value of angiogenesis by Chalkley counting in a confirmatory study design on 836 breast cancer patients.

Hansen S, Grabau DA, Sørensen FB, Bak M, Vach W, Rose C.

Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Jan;6(1):139-46.

8.
9.

Microvessel area using automated image analysis is reproducible and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer.

Sullivan CA, Ghosh S, Ocal IT, Camp RL, Rimm DL, Chung GG.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Feb;40(2):156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

PMID:
18799189
10.

Prognostic significance of angiogenesis by Chalkley counting in node negative cancer of the ampulla of Vater.

Park JS, Kim HK, Hong SW, Kim JK, Yoon DS.

J Korean Med Sci. 2012 May;27(5):495-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.5.495. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

11.

Immature tumor angiogenesis in high-grade and high-stage renal cell carcinoma.

Kinouchi T, Mano M, Matsuoka I, Kodama S, Aoki T, Okamoto M, Yamamura H, Usami M, Takahashi K.

Urology. 2003 Oct;62(4):765-70.

PMID:
14550469
12.

Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: correlation of microvessel density and microvessel area with other prognostic factors.

Sharma SG, Aggarwal N, Gupta SD, Singh MK, Gupta R, Dinda AK.

Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Mar;43(1):125-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9779-7. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

PMID:
20535637
13.

Color image analysis for quantifying renal tumor angiogenesis.

Choi HJ, Choi IH, Cho NH, Choi HK.

Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2005 Feb;27(1):43-51.

PMID:
15794451
14.

Microvessel density compared with the Chalkley count in a prognostic study of angiogenesis in breast cancer patients.

Hansen S, Sørensen FB, Vach W, Grabau DA, Bak M, Rose C.

Histopathology. 2004 May;44(5):428-36.

PMID:
15139990
15.
16.

A practical application of quantitative vascular image analysis in breast pathology.

Ozerdem U, Wojcik EM, Barkan GA, Duan X, Erşahin Ç.

Pathol Res Pract. 2013 Jul;209(7):455-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 25.

PMID:
23707548
17.

Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas.

Tuna B, Yorukoglu K, Unlu M, Mungan MU, Kirkali Z.

Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):530-4. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

PMID:
16426730
18.

Microvessel area of immature vessels is a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.

Sato M, Nakai Y, Nakata W, Yoshida T, Hatano K, Kawashima A, Fujita K, Uemura M, Takayama H, Nonomura N.

Int J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(2):130-4. doi: 10.1111/iju.12231. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

19.

Prognostic impact of angiogenesis in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer as defined by microvessel density after immunohistochemical staining for CD34.

Ajili F, Kacem M, Tounsi H, Darouiche A, Enayfer E, Chebi M, Manai M, Boubaker S.

Ultrastruct Pathol. 2012 Oct;36(5):336-42. doi: 10.3109/01913123.2012.672847. Epub 2012 May 10.

PMID:
22574784
20.

VHL mutations and their correlation with tumour cell proliferation, microvessel density, and patient prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Schraml P, Struckmann K, Hatz F, Sonnet S, Kully C, Gasser T, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ, Moch H.

J Pathol. 2002 Feb;196(2):186-93.

PMID:
11793370
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk