Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Magnification error in digital radiographs of the cervical spine against magnetic resonance imaging measurements.

Shigematsu H, Koizumi M, Yoneda M, Iida J, Oshima T, Tanaka Y.

Asian Spine J. 2013 Dec;7(4):267-72. doi: 10.4184/asj.2013.7.4.267. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

PMID:
24353842
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
2.

Clinical magnification error in lateral spinal digital radiographs.

Ravi B, Rampersaud R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):E311-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6c3f.

PMID:
18449031
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Functional turbo spin echo magnetic resonance imaging versus tomography for evaluating cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Oostveen JC, Roozeboom AR, van de Laar MA, Heeres J, den Boer JA, Lindeboom SF.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jun 1;23(11):1237-44.

PMID:
9636977
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.

Lee MC, Solomito M, Patel A.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):E656-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828d255d.

PMID:
23429689
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.

Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR, Nassr A, Andersson GB, Yoon ST, Phillips FM, Goldberg EJ, An HS.

Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):615-22.

PMID:
16291100
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography.

Read RL, Duncan CG, Wallace AD, Perry JA, Duerr FM.

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012 Sep 15;241(6):782-7. doi: 10.2460/javma.241.6.782.

PMID:
22947163
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans.

Sieradzki JP, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, Lazarus ML.

Eur Spine J. 2008 Sep;17(9):1230-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0725-7. Epub 2008 Jul 26.

PMID:
18661159
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine.

Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Tillotson M, Burton K.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12 Suppl 1:S1-S63.

PMID:
11430783
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
9.

Injuries missed by limited computed tomographic imaging of patients with cervical spine injuries.

Barrett TW, Mower WR, Zucker MI, Hoffman JR.

Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):129-33. Epub 2005 Sep 6.

PMID:
16431221
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating.

King RJ, Craig PR, Boreham BG, Majeed MA, Moran CG.

Injury. 2009 Feb;40(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.027. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

PMID:
19095234
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis.

Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 15;25(16):2072-8.

PMID:
10954638
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Assessment of injury to the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiography.

Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Schweitzer KM Jr, Lim MR, Baron EM, Rampersaud R, Oner FC, Hulbert RJ, Hedlund R, Fehlings MG, Arnold P, Harrop J, Bono CM, Anderson PA, Patel A, Anderson DG, Harris MB.

Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):422-7. Epub 2007 Jan 24. Review.

PMID:
17630140
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.

Santoro M, Jarjoura K, Cangialosi TJ.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):345-51.

PMID:
16527629
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Reproducibility of radiographic measurements for subaxial cervical spine trauma.

Bono CM, Schoenfeld A, Rampersaud R, Levi A, Grauer J, Arnold P, Fehlings M, Dvorak M, Vaccaro AR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 1;36(17):1374-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318221e169.

PMID:
21587104
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Ulnar variance: correlation of plain radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging with anatomic dissection.

Laino DK, Petchprapa CN, Lee SK.

J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jan;37(1):90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.040. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

PMID:
22119604
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Mok JM, Berven SH, Diab M, Hackbarth M, Hu SS, Deviren V.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 15;33(6):681-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa8d.

PMID:
18344863
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Helical computed tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high-energy trauma.

McCulloch PT, France J, Jones DL, Krantz W, Nguyen TP, Chambers C, Dorchak J, Mucha P.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Nov;87(11):2388-94.

PMID:
16264112
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Is radiography justified for the evaluation of patients presenting with cervical spine trauma?

Theocharopoulos N, Chatzakis G, Damilakis J.

Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4461-70.

PMID:
19928077
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

[Effect of positioning errors on magnification factors in the mandible in digital panorama imaging].

Schulze R, Schalldach F, d'Hoedt B.

Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2000 May;4(3):164-70. German.

PMID:
10900960
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk