Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 133

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24349069)

1.

Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Li M, Niu L, Qin B, Zhou Z, Ni K, Le Q, Xiang J, Wei A, Ma W, Zhou X.

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 9;8(12):e81435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081435. eCollection 2013.

2.

Early corneal nerve damage and recovery following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Mohamed-Noriega K, Riau AK, Lwin NC, Chaurasia SS, Tan DT, Mehta JS.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 25;55(3):1823-34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13324.

PMID:
24569584
3.

Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes.

Wei S, Wang Y.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;251(6):1645-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2272-0. Epub 2013 Feb 7. Erratum in: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;251(10):2495-7.

PMID:
23389552
4.

Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X.

J Refract Surg. 2014 May;30(5):310-8.

PMID:
24904933
5.

Subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film evaluation after refractive femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

Vestergaard AH, Grønbech KT, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JØ.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;251(11):2591-600. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2400-x. Epub 2013 Jun 22.

PMID:
23793872
6.

Subbasal nerve density and corneal sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome.

Patel SV, McLaren JW, Kittleson KM, Bourne WM.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;128(11):1413-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.253.

7.

Confocal comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and keratocyte reaction between FS-LASIK, OUP-SBK, and conventional LASIK.

Zhang F, Deng S, Guo N, Wang M, Sun X.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 15;53(9):5536-44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8786.

PMID:
22786909
8.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation.

Dong Z, Zhou X, Wu J, Zhang Z, Li T, Zhou Z, Zhang S, Li G.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;98(2):263-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303415. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

9.

Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.

Li M, Zhou Z, Shen Y, Knorz MC, Gong L, Zhou X.

J Refract Surg. 2014 Feb;30(2):94-100. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140120-04.

PMID:
24763474
10.

Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study.

Agca A, Ozgurhan EB, Demirok A, Bozkurt E, Celik U, Ozkaya A, Cankaya I, Yilmaz OF.

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Apr;37(2):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

PMID:
23830802
11.

Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia.

Li M, Zhao J, Shen Y, Li T, He L, Xu H, Yu Y, Zhou X.

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 29;8(10):e77797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077797. eCollection 2013.

12.
13.

Comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and sensitivity between LASIK and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).

Lee SJ, Kim JK, Seo KY, Kim EK, Lee HK.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;141(6):1009-1015.

PMID:
16765667
14.

Early changes in ocular surface and tear inflammatory mediators after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.

Gao S, Li S, Liu L, Wang Y, Ding H, Li L, Zhong X.

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e107370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107370. eCollection 2014.

15.

Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis.

Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal JØ.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;91(4):355-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02406.x. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

PMID:
22512839
16.

Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.

Wu D, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wei S, Tang X.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):954-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.056. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

PMID:
24751146
17.

Influence of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small incision lenticule extraction on corneal nerve density and ocular surface: a 1-year prospective, confocal, microscopic study.

Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H, Kamiya K.

J Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;31(1):10-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20141218-01.

PMID:
25599538
18.

Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment.

Lazaridis A, Droutsas K, Sekundo W.

J Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;30(10):680-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-04.

PMID:
25291751
19.

Corneal sensation after corneal refractive surgery with small incision lenticule extraction.

Demirok A, Ozgurhan EB, Agca A, Kara N, Bozkurt E, Cankaya KI, Yilmaz OF.

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1040-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31829d9926.

PMID:
23939296
20.

Reinnervation in the cornea after LASIK.

Lee BH, McLaren JW, Erie JC, Hodge DO, Bourne WM.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Dec;43(12):3660-4.

PMID:
12454033
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk