Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Results of a 2011 national questionnaire for investigation of mean glandular dose from mammography in Japan.

Asada Y, Suzuki S, Minami K, Shirakawa S.

J Radiol Prot. 2014 Mar;34(1):125-32. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/1/125. Epub 2013 Dec 13.

PMID:
24334729
[PubMed - in process]
2.

Investigation of mean glandular dose in diagnostic mammography in China.

Du X, Wang J, Yang CY, Zhou XF, Chen W, Cao XJ, Zhou YY, Le Yu N.

Biomed Environ Sci. 2014 May;27(5):396-9. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.067.

PMID:
24827723
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.

Jakubiak RR, Gamba HR, Neves EB, Peixoto JE.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 21;58(18):6565-83. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/18/6565. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

PMID:
24002695
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.

Marshall NW, Lemmens K, Bosmans H.

Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):811-24. doi: 10.1118/1.3675403.

PMID:
22320791
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

[Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].

Gosch D, Jendrass S, Scholz M, Kahn T.

Rofo. 2006 Jul;178(7):693-7. Epub 2006 Jun 7. German.

PMID:
16761214
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Applicability of ACR breast dosimetry methodology to a digital mammography system.

Tomon JJ, Johnson TE, Swenson KN, Schauer DA.

Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):799-807.

PMID:
16878582
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.

Ciraj-Bjelac O, Beciric S, Arandjic D, Kosutic D, Kovacevic M.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Jun;140(1):75-80. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq040. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

PMID:
20159918
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.

Jamal N, Ng KH, McLean D.

Br J Radiol. 2003 Apr;76(904):238-45.

PMID:
12711643
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme.

Hauge IH, Pedersen K, Sanderud A, Hofvind S, Olerud HM.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Jan;148(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq598. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

PMID:
21335333
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.

Sechopoulos I, Feng SS, D'Orsi CJ.

Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4110-20. Erratum in: Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):2314.

PMID:
20879571
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems.

Muhogora WE, Devetti A, Padovani R, Msaki P, Bonutti F.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):231-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn023. Epub 2008 Feb 18.

PMID:
18283065
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.

Bosmans H, De Hauwere A, Lemmens K, Zanca F, Thierens H, Van Ongeval C, Van Herck K, Van Steen A, Martens P, Bleyen L, Vande Putte G, Kellen E, Mortier G, Van Limbergen E.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2891-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0. Epub 2013 May 21.

PMID:
23689308
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.

Chida K, Inaba Y, Saito H, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S, Kohzuki M, Zuguchi M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1680-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2747.

PMID:
19933664
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.

Tsapaki V, Tsalafoutas IA, Poga V, Louizi A, Kottou S, Koulentianos E.

J Radiol Prot. 2008 Sep;28(3):337-46. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/3/004. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

PMID:
18714130
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit.

Bor D, T√ľkel S, Olgar T, Aydin E.

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008 Sep;14(3):122-6.

PMID:
18814131
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
17.

Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.

Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Averbukh A, Moran C, Berns EA, Yaffe MJ, Herman B, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):362-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2114.

PMID:
20093597
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.

McCullagh JB, Baldelli P, Phelan N.

Br J Radiol. 2011 Nov;84(1007):1027-33. doi: 10.1259/bjr/83821596. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21586506
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.

Matsumoto M, Inoue S, Honda I, Yamamoto S, Ueguchi T, Ogata Y, Johkoh T.

Radiat Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;21(6):280-4.

PMID:
14743903
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.

Bahreyni Toossi MT, Zare H, Bayani Roodi Sh, Hashemi M, Akbari F, Malekzadeh M.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Jun;155(1):96-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs317. Epub 2012 Dec 2.

PMID:
23209184
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk