Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: should incidental findings arising from prenatal testing always be reported to patients?

Bui TH, Raymond FL, Van den Veyver IB.

Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):12-7. doi: 10.1002/pd.4275. Epub 2013 Dec 5. No abstract available.

PMID:
24214820
[PubMed - in process]
2.

Experts' opinions on the benefit of an incidental prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosomal aneuploidy: a qualitative interview survey.

Pieters JJ, Verhaak CM, Braat DD, van Leeuwen E, Smits AP.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Dec;32(12):1151-7. doi: 10.1002/pd.3975. Epub 2012 Sep 30.

PMID:
23023394
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: Is aneuploidy testing by PGD indicated for all infertile patients undergoing IVF?

Harper JC, Repping S, Hill D.

Prenat Diagn. 2009 Jan;29(1):2-5. doi: 10.1002/pd.2178. No abstract available.

PMID:
19173347
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Incidental prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies: health, behavior, and fertility.

Pieters JJ, Kooper AJ, van Kessel AG, Braat DD, Smits AP.

ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:807106. doi: 10.5402/2011/807106. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

PMID:
22191050
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
5.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: should noninvasive DNA testing be the standard screening test for Down syndrome in all pregnant women?

Bianchi DW, Oepkes D, Ghidini A.

Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):6-11. doi: 10.1002/pd.4229. Epub 2013 Sep 24. No abstract available.

PMID:
24002925
[PubMed - in process]
6.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: For prenatal diagnosis, should we offer less or more than metaphase karyotyping?

Ogilvie CM, Yaron Y, Beaudet AL.

Prenat Diagn. 2009 Jan;29(1):11-4. doi: 10.1002/pd.2107. No abstract available.

PMID:
19012273
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies.

Langlois S, Duncan A.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Sep;33(9):955-60. Review.

PMID:
21923994
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

[Genetic testing in the context of the revision of the French law on bioethics].

Bonneau D, Marlin S, Sanlaville D, Dupont JM, Sobol H, Gonzales M, Le Merrer M, Malzac P, Razavi F, Manouvrier S, Odent S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D.

Pathol Biol (Paris). 2010 Oct;58(5):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Feb 8. Review. French.

PMID:
20116936
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.

Christenhusz GM, Devriendt K, Dierickx K.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Mar;21(3):248-55. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.130. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Review.

PMID:
22739341
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Ethical controversies in prenatal microarray.

Stark Z, Gillam L, Walker SP, McGillivray G.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;25(2):133-7. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835ebb67. Review.

PMID:
23454982
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.
12.

Trends in prenatal discussion and HIV testing, 1996-2001: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Lansky A, Sansom SL, Harrison LL, Stancil T.

Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):526-31. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

PMID:
17340180
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: should everyone undergoing invasive testing have a microarray?

Crolla JA, Wapner R, Van Lith JM.

Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):18-22. doi: 10.1002/pd.4287. No abstract available.

PMID:
24302430
[PubMed - in process]
14.

Attitudes toward prenatal genetic testing in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Kastrinos F, Stoffel EM, Balmaña J, Syngal S.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun;102(6):1284-90. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

PMID:
17355417
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Did the rate of incidental prostate cancer change in the era of PSA testing? A retrospective study of 1127 patients.

Zigeuner RE, Lipsky K, Riedler I, Auprich M, Schips L, Salfellner M, Pummer K, Hubmer G.

Urology. 2003 Sep;62(3):451-5.

PMID:
12946745
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Social and ethnic inequalities in the offer and uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in the UK: a systematic review.

Rowe RE, Garcia J, Davidson LL.

Public Health. 2004 Apr;118(3):177-89. Review.

PMID:
15003407
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Ascertainment bias in Turner syndrome: new insights from girls who were diagnosed incidentally in prenatal life.

Gunther DF, Eugster E, Zagar AJ, Bryant CG, Davenport ML, Quigley CA.

Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):640-4.

PMID:
15342833
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Incidental discovery of nonpaternity during prenatal testing of genetic disease.

Li D, Liao C.

Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24(1):39-41. doi: 10.1159/000132404. Epub 2008 May 27.

PMID:
18504379
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Clinically significant incidental findings among human immunodeficiency virus-infected men during computed tomography for determination of coronary artery calcium.

Crum-Cianflone N, Stepenosky J, Medina S, Wessman D, Krause D, Boswell G.

Am J Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;107(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

PMID:
21195379
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: are we ready to screen for fetal anomalies with first trimester ultrasound?

Kontopoulos E, Odibo A, Wilson RD.

Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jan;33(1):9-12. doi: 10.1002/pd.4030. No abstract available.

PMID:
23296714
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk