Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 250

1.

Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.

Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L.

J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

PMID:
24139274
2.

Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.

Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P.

J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.

PMID:
20647097
3.

Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.

Guo X, Miao H, Li L, Zhang S, Zhou D, Lu Y, Wu L.

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Sep 8;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-114.

4.

Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.

Capar ID, Ozcan E, Arslan H, Ertas H, Aydinbelge HA.

J Endod. 2014 Mar;40(3):451-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

PMID:
24565670
5.

Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.

Andrabi SM, Kumar A, Zia A, Iftekhar H, Alam S, Siddiqui S.

J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 Aug;5(3):188-93. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12033. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

PMID:
23595996
7.

A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.

Alkahtani A, Al Khudhairi TD, Anil S.

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-12.

8.

A quantitative and qualitative analysis of ultrasonic versus sonic endodontic systems on canal cleanliness and obturation.

Kanter V, Weldon E, Nair U, Varella C, Kanter K, Anusavice K, Pileggi R.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

PMID:
21906970
9.

Cleaning the apical third of curved canals after different irrigation protocols.

Pereira ES, Peixoto IF, Nakagawa RK, Buono VT, Bahia MG.

Braz Dent J. 2012;23(4):351-6.

10.

Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Goel S, Tewari S.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Sep;108(3):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.023. Epub 2009 Jul 3.

PMID:
19576804
11.

Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.

Adigüzel O, Yiğit-Özer S, Kaya S, Uysal İ, Ganidağli-Ayaz S, Akkuş Z.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

PMID:
21873086
12.

SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.

Salman MI, Baumann MA, Hellmich M, Roggendorf MJ, Termaat S.

Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01675.x.

PMID:
20518928
13.

Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.

Kaya S, Yiğit-Özer S, Adigüzel Ö.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Oct;112(4):524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.039. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

PMID:
21664155
14.

Effect of agitation of EDTA with 808-nanometer diode laser on removal of smear layer.

Arslan H, Ayrancı LB, Karatas E, Topçuoğlu HS, Yavuz MS, Kesim B.

J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1589-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.016. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

PMID:
24238453
15.

Scanning electron microscopic analysis to compare the cleaning efficiency of three different irrigation systems at different root canal levels: an in vitro study.

Tambe VH, Vishwas J, Ghonmode WN, Nagmode P, Agrawal GP, Balsaraf O.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jul 1;15(4):433-7.

PMID:
25576109
16.

Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal.

Saber Sel-D, Hashem AA.

J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1272-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

PMID:
21846546
17.

Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.

Blank-Gonçalves LM, Nabeshima CK, Martins GH, Machado ME.

J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1268-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

PMID:
21846545
18.

In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars.

Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K.

J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

PMID:
22414827
19.

The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.

Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT.

Int Endod J. 2005 May;38(5):285-90.

PMID:
15876291
20.

Effectiveness of various irrigation activation protocols and the self-adjusting file system on smear layer and debris removal.

Çapar İD, Aydinbelge HA.

Scanning. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):640-7. doi: 10.1002/sca.21171. Epub 2014 Oct 6.

PMID:
25285423
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk