Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 98

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 24135001)

1.

Carbon plate shows even distribution of stress, decreases screw loosening, and increases recovery of preoperative daily feed intake amount in a rabbit model of mandibular continuity defects.

Lee SW, György S, Choi JB, Choi JY, Kim SG.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):e245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24135001
2.

Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling.

Markwardt J, Pfeifer G, Eckelt U, Reitemeier B.

Onkologie. 2007 Mar;30(3):121-6. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

PMID:
17341898
3.

[Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].

Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P.

Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 Jul;8(4):237-43. Epub 2004 Apr 30. German.

PMID:
15293119
4.

Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects.

Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;34(4):201-9. Epub 2006 Apr 27.

PMID:
16644232
5.

Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.

Li P, Shen L, Li J, Liang R, Tian W, Tang W.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;42(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

PMID:
23541861
6.

The modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 2: finite element analysis of endoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible.

Wong RC, Tideman H, Merkx MA, Jansen J, Goh SM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):e487-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

PMID:
22516866
7.

Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction.

Kimura A, Nagasao T, Kaneko T, Tamaki T, Miyamoto J, Nakajima T.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;34(4):193-200. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

PMID:
16624567
8.

Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy.

Narra N, Valášek J, Hannula M, Marcián P, Sándor GK, Hyttinen J, Wolff J.

J Biomech. 2014 Jan 3;47(1):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

PMID:
24290177
9.

The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.

Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, Sándor GK, Avery CM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):855-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

PMID:
24467871
10.

Establishment of sequential software processing for a biomechanical model of mandibular reconstruction with custom-made plate.

Li P, Tang Y, Li J, Shen L, Tian W, Tang W.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Sep;111(3):642-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.024. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

PMID:
23810232
11.

Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-term follow-up.

Maurer P, Eckert AW, Kriwalsky MS, Schubert J.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;48(2):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

PMID:
19647911
12.

A Comparative Evaluation of Fixation Techniques in Anterior Mandibular Fractures Using 2.0 mm Monocortical Titanium Miniplates Versus 2.4 mm Cortical Titanium Lag Screws.

Goyal M, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Marya K, Dua JS, Yadav S.

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Dec;11(4):442-50. doi: 10.1007/s12663-012-0342-1. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

13.

Titanium-coated hollow screw and reconstruction plate system (THORP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Hellem S, Olofsson J.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1988 May;16(4):173-83.

PMID:
3290261
14.

Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.

Oguz Y, Uckan S, Ozden AU, Uckan E, Eser A.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Aug;108(2):174-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.051.

PMID:
19615655
15.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.

Gateno J, Cookston C, Hsu SS, Stal DN, Durrani SK, Gold J, Ismaily S, Alexander JW, Noble PC, Xia JJ.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1900-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.218. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

PMID:
24012175
16.

A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction.

Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Tamaki T, Kawana H.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):346-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.009. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

PMID:
20097102
17.

[Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus].

Eba M.

Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi. 1990;19(3):356-76. Japanese.

PMID:
2134896
18.

[Plate related complication after mandibular reconstruction].

Liu SP, Cai ZG, Zhang J, Zhang JG, Zhang Y.

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;48(10):586-90. Chinese.

PMID:
24438564
19.

Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.

Chang YW, Liu PH.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3167-70. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610213.

PMID:
24110400
20.

Screw angulation affects bone-screw stresses and bone graft load sharing in anterior cervical corpectomy fusion with a rigid screw-plate construct: a finite element model study.

Hussain M, Natarajan RN, Fayyazi AH, Braaksma BR, Andersson GB, An HS.

Spine J. 2009 Dec;9(12):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.461. Epub 2009 Oct 9.

PMID:
19819193
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk