Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 91

1.

Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.

Jain M, Varghese J, Mascarenhas R, Mogra S, Shetty S, Dhakar N.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Jul;4(3):307-12. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.118361.

2.

Roth versus MBT: does bracket prescription have an effect on the subjective outcome of pre-adjusted edgewise treatment?

Moesi B, Dyer F, Benson PE.

Eur J Orthod. 2013 Apr;35(2):236-43. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr126. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

3.

Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.

Campbell CL, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Qi R.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):822-9.

PMID:
18068603
4.

A three-dimensional comparison of torque achieved with a preadjusted edgewise appliance using a Roth or MBT prescription.

Mittal M, Thiruvenkatachari B, Sandler PJ, Benson PE.

Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):292-7. doi: 10.2319/122313-941. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

PMID:
24978676
5.

Need for training sessions for orthodontists in the use of the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.

Murakami K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Imai M, Miyawaki S, Takano-Yamamoto T.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):427.e1-6.

PMID:
17920490
6.

Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system.

Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Nov;122(5):451-5.

PMID:
12439471
7.

Validation of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for assessing the treatment outcomes of Chinese patients.

Song GY, Baumrind S, Zhao ZH, Ding Y, Bai YX, Wang L, He H, Shen G, Li WR, Wu WZ, Ren C, Weng XR, Geng Z, Xu TM.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.018.

PMID:
23992811
8.

Comparison of prospectively and retrospectively selected American Board of Orthodontics cases.

Struble BH, Huang GJ.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):6.e1-8; discussion 6-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.016.

PMID:
20122416
9.

Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.

Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):292-8; discussion 298.

PMID:
16168325
11.

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jan;131(1):51-6.

PMID:
17208106
12.

[Validation of subjective and objective evaluation methods for orthodontic treatment outcome].

Song GY, Jiang RP, Zhang XY, Liu SQ, Yu XN, Chen Q, Weng XR, Wu WZ, Su H, Ren C, Shan RK, Geng Z, Xu TM; Research Group of Establishing Chinese Evaluation Standard of Orthodontic Treatment Outcome.

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2015 Feb 18;47(1):90-7. Chinese.

13.

Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program.

Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Nov;126(5):533-43.

PMID:
15520685
14.

Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system.

Detterline DA, Isikbay SC, Brizendine EJ, Kula KS.

Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):528-32. doi: 10.2319/060309-315.1.

PMID:
20050748
15.

Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.

Hildebrand JC, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Sivik M, Hans M.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Feb;133(2):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.035.

PMID:
18249296
16.

The excellence challenge in orthodontics: clinical use of an objective grading system for orthodontic cases.

Cordua T, Ursini R, Giuliante L, Deli R.

Prog Orthod. 2009;10(2):4-15.

PMID:
20545087
17.
18.
19.

Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.

Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):624-9.

PMID:
16286210
20.

Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.

Nett BC, Huang GJ.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Apr;127(4):444-50; quiz 516.

PMID:
15821689
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk