Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24105924)

1.

Remote monitoring of implantable pacemakers: in-office setup significantly improves successful data transmission.

Ren X, Apostolakos C, Vo TH, Shaw RE, Shields K, Banki NM, Zuckermann DW, Flint AC, Hongo RH, Goldschlager NF.

Clin Cardiol. 2013 Oct;36(10):634-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.22207. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

PMID:
24105924
2.

Incidence and predictors of pacemaker reprogramming: potential consequences for remote follow-up.

Udo EO, van Hemel NM, Zuithoff NP, Barrett MJ, Ruiter JH, Doevendans PA, Moons KG.

Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):978-83. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut002. Epub 2013 Feb 17.

3.

Remote patient management using implantable devices.

Movsowitz C, Mittal S.

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun;31(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9548-2. Epub 2011 Feb 17. Review.

PMID:
21328042
4.

Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers.

Crossley GH, Chen J, Choucair W, Cohen TJ, Gohn DC, Johnson WB, Kennedy EE, Mongeon LR, Serwer GA, Qiao H, Wilkoff BL; PREFER Study Investigators.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 24;54(22):2012-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001.

5.

Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator.

Heidbüchel H, Lioen P, Foulon S, Huybrechts W, Ector J, Willems R, Ector H.

Europace. 2008 Mar;10(3):351-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun010. Epub 2008 Feb 1.

7.

Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients.

Folino AF, Breda R, Calzavara P, Borghetti F, Comisso J, Iliceto S, Buja G.

Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):382-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus351. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

8.

Effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable loop recorder.

Drak-Hernández Y, Toquero-Ramos J, Fernández JM, Pérez-Pereira E, Castro-Urda V, Fernández-Lozano I.

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Dec;66(12):943-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

PMID:
24774107
9.

Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database.

Lazarus A.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S2-S12. Erratum in: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Nov;30(11):1424.

PMID:
17302706
10.

Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry.

Ricci RP, Morichelli L, D'Onofrio A, Calò L, Vaccari D, Zanotto G, Curnis A, Buja G, Rovai N, Gargaro A.

Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):970-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus440. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

11.

Clinical and economic impact of remote monitoring on the follow-up of patients with implantable electronic cardiovascular devices: an observational study.

Costa PD, Reis AH, Rodrigues PP.

Telemed J E Health. 2013 Feb;19(2):71-80. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0064. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

PMID:
23336734
12.

In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: patients' inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey.

Gramegna L, Tomasi C, Gasparini G, Scaboro G, Zanon F, Boaretto G, Tomei R, Tomasi L.

Europace. 2012 Mar;14(3):345-50. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur334. Epub 2011 Nov 11.

13.

Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Burri H, Senouf D.

Europace. 2009 Jun;11(6):701-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup110. Review. Erratum in: Europace. 2009 Nov;11(11):1569.

14.

Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical evaluation Of remote NotificatioN to rEduCe Time to clinical decision (CONNECT) study.

Crossley G, Boyle A, Vitense H, Sherfesee L, Mead RH.

Am Heart J. 2008 Nov;156(5):840-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.028. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

PMID:
19061696
15.

Early event detection using a home monitoring system for patients with cardiac pacemakers.

Tang J, Chen S.

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2014 Apr;26(2):131-5.

PMID:
24122156
16.

The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts.

Crossley GH, Boyle A, Vitense H, Chang Y, Mead RH; CONNECT Investigators.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 8;57(10):1181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.012. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

17.

Advances in remote monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems.

Jung W, Rillig A, Birkemeyer R, Miljak T, Meyerfeldt U.

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Oct;23(1):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s10840-008-9311-5. Epub 2008 Sep 27. Review.

PMID:
18821006
18.

A randomized controlled clinical trial of pacemaker follow-up in clinic and by telemedical interpretation of the pacemakers' magnet mode.

Hayn D, Kollmann A, Perl S, Kos C, Rotman B, Lercher P, Tscheliessnigg KH, Schreier G.

J Telemed Telecare. 2013 Dec;19(8):456-65. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13512066. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

PMID:
24197403
19.

[Telemedicine in pacemaker therapy and follow-up].

Schuchert A.

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2009 Dec;20(4):164-72. doi: 10.1007/s00399-009-0058-1. German.

PMID:
19937330
20.

Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator infections: seven years of diagnostic and therapeutic experience of a single center.

Cengiz M, Okutucu S, Ascioglu S, Sahin A, Aksoy H, Sinan Deveci O, Baris Kaya E, Aytemir K, Kabakci G, Tokgozoglu L, Ozkutlu H, Oto A.

Clin Cardiol. 2010 Jul;33(7):406-11. doi: 10.1002/clc.20765.

PMID:
20641117
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk