Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 169

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24073883)

1.

Evolution of mate-harm, longevity and behaviour in male fruit flies subjected to different levels of interlocus conflict.

Nandy B, Gupta V, Sen S, Udaykumar N, Samant MA, Ali SZ, Prasad NG.

BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Sep 28;13:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-212.

2.

Experimental evolution of female traits under different levels of intersexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nandy B, Gupta V, Udaykumar N, Samant MA, Sen S, Prasad NG.

Evolution. 2014 Feb;68(2):412-25. doi: 10.1111/evo.12271. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

PMID:
24117169
3.

Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.

Wigby S, Chapman T.

Evolution. 2004 May;58(5):1028-37.

PMID:
15212383
4.

Sperm competitive ability evolves in response to experimental alteration of operational sex ratio.

Nandy B, Chakraborty P, Gupta V, Ali SZ, Prasad NG.

Evolution. 2013 Jul;67(7):2133-41. doi: 10.1111/evo.12076. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

PMID:
23815666
5.

Increased opportunity for sexual conflict promotes harmful males with elevated courtship frequencies.

Crudgington HS, Fellows S, Snook RR.

J Evol Biol. 2010 Feb;23(2):440-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01907.x. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

PMID:
20039999
6.

Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection.

Pitnick S, Miller GT, Reagan J, Holland B.

Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 22;268(1471):1071-80.

7.
8.

Reproductive behaviour evolves rapidly when intralocus sexual conflict is removed.

Bedhomme S, Prasad NG, Jiang PP, Chippindale AK.

PLoS One. 2008 May 14;3(5):e2187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002187.

10.

Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.

Pitnick S, Brown WD, Miller GT.

Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 22;268(1467):557-63.

11.

The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Arbuthnott D, Dutton EM, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

Ecol Lett. 2014 Feb;17(2):221-8. doi: 10.1111/ele.12222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

PMID:
24215269
12.

Reproductive consequences of population divergence through sexual conflict.

Martin OY, Hosken DJ.

Curr Biol. 2004 May 25;14(10):906-10.

PMID:
15186748
13.

Hermaphrodite life history and the maintenance of partial selfing in experimental populations of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Carvalho S, Phillips PC, Teotónio H.

BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Jun 2;14:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-117.

15.

A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Long TA, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR.

PLoS Biol. 2009 Dec;7(12):e1000254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000254. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

16.

Ejaculate depletion patterns evolve in response to experimental manipulation of sex ratio in Drosophila melanogaster.

Linklater JR, Wertheim B, Wigby S, Chapman T.

Evolution. 2007 Aug;61(8):2027-34.

PMID:
17683443
17.

Costs and benefits of lifetime exposure to mating rivals in male Drosophila melanogaster.

Bretman A, Westmancoat JD, Gage MJ, Chapman T.

Evolution. 2013 Aug;67(8):2413-22. doi: 10.1111/evo.12125. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23888861
18.

The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Bonduriansky R.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. Review.

PMID:
11569787
19.

Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution.

Stewart AD, Morrow EH, Rice WR.

Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 7;272(1576):2029-35.

20.

Remating and sperm competition in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to alternative environments.

Arbuthnott D, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e90207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090207. eCollection 2014.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk