Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Grant applications with a result-based orientation.

Krumholz HM.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):507-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000562. Epub 2013 Sep 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
24021690
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
2.

NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.

Roy HK.

Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):176. doi: 10.1038/490176a. No abstract available.

PMID:
23060177
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

An introduction to grant writing: de-mystifying the process.

Walsh MM, Bowen DM.

J Dent Hyg. 2012 Winter;86(1):11-3. Epub 2012 Feb 6. No abstract available.

PMID:
22309922
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

A new paradigm for funding cardiovascular-outcome research in general practice. The Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study. ANBP2 Management Committee.

Reid CM, Wing LM, Graham DH.

Med J Aust. 1998 Oct 5;169(7):349-50. No abstract available.

PMID:
9803242
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Peer review reviewed.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2007 Sep 13;449(7159):115. No abstract available.

PMID:
17851475
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.

Berg JM.

Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):203. doi: 10.1038/489203a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22972279
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Funding: the research revolution.

Brumfiel G.

Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):975-6. doi: 10.1038/453975a. No abstract available.

PMID:
18563124
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel.

Graves N, Barnett AG, Clarke P.

BMJ. 2011 Sep 27;343:d4797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4797.

PMID:
21951756
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

Grant applications: Undo NIH policy to ease effect of cuts.

Benezra R.

Nature. 2013 Jan 24;493(7433):480. doi: 10.1038/493480e. No abstract available.

PMID:
23344348
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.

Dove A.

Nat Med. 2006 Jan;12(1):5. No abstract available.

PMID:
16397535
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Impact factors: target the funding bodies.

Insall R.

Nature. 2003 Jun 5;423(6940):585. No abstract available.

PMID:
12789312
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Why China needs an NIH.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):679. No abstract available.

PMID:
15085093
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Research programs of the AOA and their role in osteopathic medical education.

Retz KC, McGill SL.

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1997 Nov;97(11):678-82. No abstract available.

PMID:
9397652
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions.

Wadman M.

Nature. 1997 Oct 30;389(6654):898. No abstract available.

PMID:
9353109
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Science funding: Duel to the death.

Bhattacharya A.

Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):20-2. doi: 10.1038/488020a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22859184
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

More time for research: fund people not projects.

Ioannidis JP.

Nature. 2011 Sep 28;477(7366):529-31. doi: 10.1038/477529a. No abstract available.

PMID:
21956312
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Japan to slash huge grant scheme.

Cyranoski D.

Nature. 2009 Oct 15;461(7266):854-5. doi: 10.1038/461854a. No abstract available.

PMID:
19829338
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.
19.

Promoting quality improvement research.

Frank JE, Kim TM, Nelson EC.

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Aug;28(8):451-2, 417.

PMID:
12174409
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Hints of age bias spur calls for grant reforms.

Cyranoski D, Kandachi K.

Nature. 2003 Feb 13;421(6924):680. No abstract available.

PMID:
12610587
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk