Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 112

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24015528)

1.

The importance of progressive senescence in the biomass dynam of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).

Rodriguez GE, Rassweiler A, Reed DC, Holbrook SJ.

Ecology. 2013 Aug;94(8):1848-58.

PMID:
24015528
2.

Synchrony in dynamics of giant kelp forests is driven by both local recruitment and regional environmental controls.

Cavanaugh KC, Kendall BE, Siegel DA, Reed DC, Alberto F, Assis J.

Ecology. 2013 Feb;94(2):499-509.

PMID:
23691668
3.

Biomass rather than growth rate determines variation in net primary production by giant kelp.

Reed DC, Rassweiler A, Arkema KK.

Ecology. 2008 Sep;89(9):2493-505.

PMID:
18831171
4.

Wave disturbance overwhelms top-down and bottom-up control of primary production in California kelp forests.

Reed DC, Rassweiler A, Carr MH, Cavanaugh KC, Malone DP, Siegel DA.

Ecology. 2011 Nov;92(11):2108-16.

PMID:
22164835
5.

Net primary production, growth, and standing crop of Macrocystis pyrifera in Southern California.

Rassweiler A, Arkema KK, Reed DC, Zimmerman RC, Brzezinski MA.

Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):2068.

PMID:
18705392
6.

Density derived estimates of standing crop and net primary production in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera.

Reed D, Rassweiler A, Arkema K.

Mar Biol. 2009;156(10):2077-2083. Epub 2009 Jun 28.

7.

Direct and indirect effects of giant kelp determine benthic community structure and dynamics.

Arkema KK, Reed DC, Schroeter SC.

Ecology. 2009 Nov;90(11):3126-37.

PMID:
19967868
8.

Translocation of C in Macrocystis pyrifera (Giant Kelp).

Lobban CS.

Plant Physiol. 1978 Apr;61(4):585-9.

9.

Assessing the low frequency acoustic characteristics of Macrocystis pyrifera, Egregia menziessi, and Laminaria solidungula.

Wilson CJ, Wilson PS, Dunton KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jun;133(6):3819-26. doi: 10.1121/1.4802637.

PMID:
23742336
10.

Patch definition in metapopulation analysis: a graph theory approach to solve the mega-patch problem.

Cavanaugh KC, Siegel DA, Raimondi PT, Alberto F.

Ecology. 2014 Feb;95(2):316-28.

PMID:
24669726
11.
12.

Post-glacial redistribution and shifts in productivity of giant kelp forests.

Graham MH, Kinlan BP, Grosberg RK.

Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 7;277(1680):399-406. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1664. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

13.

Habitat continuity and geographic distance predict population genetic differentiation in giant kelp.

Alberto F, Raimondi PT, Reed DC, Coelho NC, Leblois R, Whitmer A, Serrão EA.

Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):49-56.

PMID:
20380195
14.

Roles of transport and mixing processes in kelp forest ecology.

Gaylord B, Nickols KJ, Jurgens L.

J Exp Biol. 2012 Mar 15;215(Pt 6):997-1007. doi: 10.1242/jeb.059824. Review.

15.
16.
17.

Context-dependent effects of fishing: variation in trophic cascades across environmental gradients.

Shears NT, Babcock RC, Salomon AK.

Ecol Appl. 2008 Dec;18(8):1860-73.

PMID:
19263884
18.
19.

Cascading effects of fishing can alter carbon flow through a temperate coastal ecosystem.

Salomon AK, Shears NT, Langlois TJ, Babcock RC.

Ecol Appl. 2008 Dec;18(8):1874-87.

PMID:
19263885
20.

Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

Konotchick T, Dupont CL, Valas RE, Badger JH, Allen AE.

New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(2):398-407. doi: 10.1111/nph.12160. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk