Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 151


Reconfiguration of network hub structure after propofol-induced unconsciousness.

Lee H, Mashour GA, Noh GJ, Kim S, Lee U.

Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1347-59. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a8ec8c.


Simultaneous electroencephalographic and functional magnetic resonance imaging indicate impaired cortical top-down processing in association with anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

Jordan D, Ilg R, Riedl V, Schorer A, Grimberg S, Neufang S, Omerovic A, Berger S, Untergehrer G, Preibisch C, Schulz E, Schuster T, Schröter M, Spoormaker V, Zimmer C, Hemmer B, Wohlschläger A, Kochs EF, Schneider G.

Anesthesiology. 2013 Nov;119(5):1031-42. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a7ca92.


Connectivity changes underlying spectral EEG changes during propofol-induced loss of consciousness.

Boly M, Moran R, Murphy M, Boveroux P, Bruno MA, Noirhomme Q, Ledoux D, Bonhomme V, Brichant JF, Tononi G, Laureys S, Friston K.

J Neurosci. 2012 May 16;32(20):7082-90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3769-11.2012.


Disruption of frontal-parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane.

Lee U, Ku S, Noh G, Baek S, Choi B, Mashour GA.

Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1264-75. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829103f5.


Preferential inhibition of frontal-to-parietal feedback connectivity is a neurophysiologic correlate of general anesthesia in surgical patients.

Ku SW, Lee U, Noh GJ, Jun IG, Mashour GA.

PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025155. Epub 2011 Oct 5.


Directional connectivity between frontal and posterior brain regions is altered with increasing concentrations of propofol.

Maksimow A, Silfverhuth M, Långsjö J, Kaskinoro K, Georgiadis S, Jääskeläinen S, Scheinin H.

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 24;9(11):e113616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113616. eCollection 2014.


Dynamic change of global and local information processing in propofol-induced loss and recovery of consciousness.

Monti MM, Lutkenhoff ES, Rubinov M, Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Noirhomme Q, Boly M, Laureys S.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(10):e1003271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003271. Epub 2013 Oct 17.


Spatiotemporal reconfiguration of large-scale brain functional networks during propofol-induced loss of consciousness.

Schröter MS, Spoormaker VI, Schorer A, Wohlschläger A, Czisch M, Kochs EF, Zimmer C, Hemmer B, Schneider G, Jordan D, Ilg R.

J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 12;32(37):12832-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6046-11.2012.


Fronto-parietal connectivity is a non-static phenomenon with characteristic changes during unconsciousness.

Untergehrer G, Jordan D, Kochs EF, Ilg R, Schneider G.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e87498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087498. eCollection 2014.


Feedback suppression in anesthesia. Is it reversible?

Hudetz AG.

Conscious Cogn. 2009 Dec;18(4):1079-81. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 8.


Breakdown of within- and between-network resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity during propofol-induced loss of consciousness.

Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, Noirhomme Q, Lauwick S, Luxen A, Degueldre C, Plenevaux A, Schnakers C, Phillips C, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V, Maquet P, Greicius MD, Laureys S, Boly M.

Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1038-53. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f697f5.


Brain functional integration decreases during propofol-induced loss of consciousness.

Schrouff J, Perlbarg V, Boly M, Marrelec G, Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Phillips C, Pélégrini-Issac M, Maquet P, Benali H.

Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Apr 16.


The directionality and functional organization of frontoparietal connectivity during consciousness and anesthesia in humans.

Lee U, Kim S, Noh GJ, Choi BM, Hwang E, Mashour GA.

Conscious Cogn. 2009 Dec;18(4):1069-78. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 May 13.


Rapid fragmentation of neuronal networks at the onset of propofol-induced unconsciousness.

Lewis LD, Weiner VS, Mukamel EA, Donoghue JA, Eskandar EN, Madsen JR, Anderson WS, Hochberg LR, Cash SS, Brown EN, Purdon PL.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):E3377-86. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210907109. Epub 2012 Nov 5.


Neurophysiological correlates of sevoflurane-induced unconsciousness.

Blain-Moraes S, Tarnal V, Vanini G, Alexander A, Rosen D, Shortal B, Janke E, Mashour GA.

Anesthesiology. 2015 Feb;122(2):307-16. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000482.


A comparison of propofol- and dexmedetomidine-induced electroencephalogram dynamics using spectral and coherence analysis.

Akeju O, Pavone KJ, Westover MB, Vazquez R, Prerau MJ, Harrell PG, Hartnack KE, Rhee J, Sampson AL, Habeeb K, Gao L, Pierce ET, Walsh JL, Brown EN, Purdon PL.

Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):978-89. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000419. Erratum in: Anesthesiology. 2015 Apr;122(4):958. Lei, Gao [corrected to Gao, Lei].


Posterior cingulate cortex-related co-activation patterns: a resting state FMRI study in propofol-induced loss of consciousness.

Amico E, Gomez F, Di Perri C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Lesenfants D, Boveroux P, Bonhomme V, Brichant JF, Marinazzo D, Laureys S.

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e100012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100012. eCollection 2014.


Thalamus, brainstem and salience network connectivity changes during propofol-induced sedation and unconsciousness.

Guldenmund P, Demertzi A, Boveroux P, Boly M, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA, Gosseries O, Noirhomme Q, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V, Laureys S, Soddu A.

Brain Connect. 2013;3(3):273-85. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0117.


Differential effects of deep sedation with propofol on the specific and nonspecific thalamocortical systems: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Liu X, Lauer KK, Ward BD, Li SJ, Hudetz AG.

Anesthesiology. 2013 Jan;118(1):59-69. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318277a801.


Brain networks maintain a scale-free organization across consciousness, anesthesia, and recovery: evidence for adaptive reconfiguration.

Lee U, Oh G, Kim S, Noh G, Choi B, Mashour GA.

Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1081-91. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f229b5.

Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk