Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 102

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24013402)

1.

RecG and UvsW catalyse robust DNA rewinding critical for stalled DNA replication fork rescue.

Manosas M, Perumal SK, Bianco PR, Ritort F, Benkovic SJ, Croquette V.

Nat Commun. 2013;4:2368. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3368. Erratum in: Nat Commun. 2014;5:4210. Bianco, Piero [corrected to Bianco, Piero R].

2.

Characterization of the ATPase activity of RecG and RuvAB proteins on model fork structures reveals insight into stalled DNA replication fork repair.

Abd Wahab S, Choi M, Bianco PR.

J Biol Chem. 2013 Sep 13;288(37):26397-409. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.500223. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

3.
4.

Direct observation of stalled fork restart via fork regression in the T4 replication system.

Manosas M, Perumal SK, Croquette V, Benkovic SJ.

Science. 2012 Nov 30;338(6111):1217-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1225437.

5.

Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: I. Both RecG and RuvAB catalyze regression, but RuvC cleaves the holliday junctions formed by RecG preferentially.

Gupta S, Yeeles JT, Marians KJ.

J Biol Chem. 2014 Oct 10;289(41):28376-87. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.587881. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

PMID:
25138216
6.

Crystallographic and NMR analyses of UvsW and UvsW.1 from bacteriophage T4.

Kerr ID, Sivakolundu S, Li Z, Buchsbaum JC, Knox LA, Kriwacki R, White SW.

J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 23;282(47):34392-400. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

7.

The phage T4 protein UvsW drives Holliday junction branch migration.

Webb MR, Plank JL, Long DT, Hsieh TS, Kreuzer KN.

J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 23;282(47):34401-11. Epub 2007 Sep 5.

9.

Interaction of T4 UvsW helicase and single-stranded DNA binding protein gp32 through its carboxy-terminal acidic tail.

Perumal SK, Nelson SW, Benkovic SJ.

J Mol Biol. 2013 Aug 23;425(16):2823-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 1.

10.

Interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair based on the structure of RecG helicase.

Briggs GS, Mahdi AA, Weller GR, Wen Q, Lloyd RG.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 29;359(1441):49-59. Review.

11.

UvsX recombinase and Dda helicase rescue stalled bacteriophage T4 DNA replication forks in vitro.

Kadyrov FA, Drake JW.

J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20;279(34):35735-40. Epub 2004 Jun 11.

12.

Resolving Holliday junctions with Escherichia coli UvrD helicase.

Carter AS, Tahmaseb K, Compton SA, Matson SW.

J Biol Chem. 2012 Mar 9;287(11):8126-34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.314047. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

13.

Fork regression is an active helicase-driven pathway in bacteriophage T4.

Long DT, Kreuzer KN.

EMBO Rep. 2009 Apr;10(4):394-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.13. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

14.
15.

Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG.

McGlynn P, Lloyd RG.

Trends Genet. 2002 Aug;18(8):413-9. Review.

PMID:
12142010
16.

A step backward in advancing DNA replication: rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG.

Dillingham MS, Kowalczykowski SC.

Mol Cell. 2001 Oct;8(4):734-6.

17.

RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression.

Buss JA, Kimura Y, Bianco PR.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Dec;36(22):7029-42. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn795. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

18.

Characterisation of the catalytically active form of RecG helicase.

McGlynn P, Mahdi AA, Lloyd RG.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jun 15;28(12):2324-32.

19.

Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases.

B├ętous R, Couch FB, Mason AC, Eichman BF, Manosas M, Cortez D.

Cell Rep. 2013 Jun 27;3(6):1958-69. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

20.

Control of helicase loading in the coupled DNA replication and recombination systems of bacteriophage T4.

Branagan AM, Klein JA, Jordan CS, Morrical SW.

J Biol Chem. 2014 Jan 31;289(5):3040-54. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.505842. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk