Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 163

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 24003259)

1.

The effectiveness of 3T time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up evaluations after the stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms.

Cho WS, Kim SS, Lee SJ, Kim SH.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Jun;55(5):604-13. doi: 10.1177/0284185113502335. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

PMID:
24003259
2.

Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils.

Ferré JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, Carsin M, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Gauvrit JY, Desal HA.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Dec;72(3):365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 21.

PMID:
18809272
3.

MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.

Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Lavini C, Sluzewski M, van Rijn JC, den Heeten GJ.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Jun-Jul;26(6):1349-56.

4.

Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images.

Cho YD, Kim KM, Lee WJ, Sohn CH, Kang HS, Kim JE, Han MH.

Korean J Radiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;15(1):161-8. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.161. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

5.

Evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of visceral arterial aneurysms after coil embolization.

Iryo Y, Ikushima I, Hirai T, Yonenaga K, Yamashita Y.

Acta Radiol. 2013 Jun;54(5):493-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113475920. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23436827
6.

No advantage of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla compared to 1.5 Tesla in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Buhk JH, Kallenberg K, Mohr A, Dechent P, Knauth M.

Neuroradiology. 2008 Oct;50(10):855-61. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0413-7. Epub 2008 Jun 4.

PMID:
18523761
7.

Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, Righi C, Simionato F, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Kirchin MA, Scotti G.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1530-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1166. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

8.

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with the enterprise stent for cerebral aneurysms.

Takayama K, Taoka T, Nakagawa H, Myouchin K, Wada T, Sakamoto M, Fukusumi A, Iwasaki S, Kurokawa S, Kichikawa K.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):568-72. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31822bd498.

PMID:
21926851
9.

Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms.

Bakker NA, Westerlaan HE, Metzemaekers JD, van Dijk JM, Eshghi OS, Mooij JJ, Groen RJ.

Acta Radiol. 2010 Mar;51(2):226-32. doi: 10.3109/02841850903436642.

PMID:
20088646
12.
13.

Evaluation of angiographic computed tomography in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms--a comparative study with DSA and TOF-MRA.

Buhk JH, Kallenberg K, Mohr A, Dechent P, Knauth M.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):430-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1171-y. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

PMID:
18810455
14.

Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series.

Pierot L, Portefaix C, Boulin A, Gauvrit JY.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2255-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2466-6. Epub 2012 May 9. Erratum in: Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2282.

PMID:
22569997
15.

Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size.

Deutschmann HA, Augustin M, Simbrunner J, Unger B, Schoellnast H, Fritz GA, Klein GE.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):628-34.

16.

Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils.

Wikström J, Ronne-Engström E, Gal G, Enblad P, Tovi M.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Mar;49(2):190-6. doi: 10.1080/02841850701732940. Erratum in: Acta Radiol. 2009 Apr;50(3):349.

PMID:
18300146
17.

Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary?

Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg R, Rinkel GJ, Akkerman EM, Ferns SP, Majoie CB.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Oct;30(9):1665-71. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1678. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

18.

Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study.

Urbach H, Dorenbeck U, von Falkenhausen M, Wilhelm K, Willinek W, Schaller C, Flacke S.

Neuroradiology. 2008 May;50(5):383-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0355-5.

PMID:
18196229
19.

Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Pierot L, Delcourt C, Bouquigny F, Breidt D, Feuillet B, Lanoix O, Gallas S.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Apr;27(4):744-9.

20.

Noninvasive imaging after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and 64-row multidetector computed tomography--a pilot study.

Kovács A, Möhlenbruch M, Hadizadeh DR, Seifert M, Greschus S, Clusmann H, Willinek WA, Flacke S, Urbach H.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):573-82. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318224e528.

PMID:
21926852
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk