Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Activity intensity during free-living activities in children and adolescents with inherited arrhythmia syndromes: assessment by combined accelerometer and heart rate monitor.

Gow RM, Borghese MM, Honeywell CR, Colley RC.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;6(5):939-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000514. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

2.

Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals.

Macfarlane DJ, Chan D, Chan KL, Ho EY, Lee CC.

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Oct;104(3):435-44. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0789-4. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

PMID:
18560880
3.

Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily life.

Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, Chan D.

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Nov;101(5):1328-34. Epub 2006 Jul 6.

4.

Calibration of the RT3 accelerometer for various patterns of physical activity in children and adolescents.

Vanhelst J, Béghin L, Rasoamanana P, Theunynck D, Meskini T, Iliescu C, Duhamel A, Turck D, Gottrand F.

J Sports Sci. 2010 Feb;28(4):381-7. doi: 10.1080/02640410903508821.

PMID:
20175015
5.

The use of accelerometry in adolescents and its implementation with non-wear time activity diaries in free-living conditions.

Ottevaere C, Huybrechts I, De Meester F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cuenca-Garcia M, De Henauw S.

J Sports Sci. 2011 Jan;29(1):103-13. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.521169.

PMID:
21104522
6.

Validation and calibration of the activPAL™ for estimating METs and physical activity in 4-6 year olds.

Janssen X, Cliff DP, Reilly JJ, Hinkley T, Jones RA, Batterham M, Ekelund U, Brage S, Okely AD.

J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Nov;17(6):602-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.252. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

PMID:
24289913
7.
8.

Limitations of cadence-based walking for assessing bouts of moderate-to vigorous-intensity physical activity under free-living conditions.

Ayabe M, Brubaker PH, Sunami Y, Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Tanaka H.

J Sports Sci. 2013;31(16):1805-14. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.803589. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

PMID:
23879643
9.

Comparison of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of physical activity among adolescents under free-living conditions: the HELENA study.

Vanhelst J, Béghin L, Duhamel A, Bergman P, Sjöström M, Gottrand F.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Mar 12;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-26.

10.

Preliminary evidence of physical activity levels measured by accelerometer in Spanish adolescents: the AFINOS Study.

Martínez-Gómez D, Welk GJ, Calle ME, Marcos A, Veiga OL; AFINOS Study Group.

Nutr Hosp. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):226-32.

11.

Metabolic syndrome risk score and time expended in moderate to vigorous physical activity in adolescents.

Stabelini Neto A, de Campos W, Dos Santos GC, Mazzardo Junior O.

BMC Pediatr. 2014 Feb 14;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-42.

12.
13.

Artificial neural networks to predict activity type and energy expenditure in youth.

Trost SG, Wong WK, Pfeiffer KA, Zheng Y.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Sep;44(9):1801-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318258ac11.

14.

Relationships of self-reported physical activity domains with accelerometry recordings in French adults.

Jacobi D, Charles MA, Tafflet M, Lommez A, Borys JM, Oppert JM.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(4):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9329-8. Epub 2009 Mar 13.

PMID:
19283494
15.

Week-to-week differences of children's habitual activity and postural allocation as measured by the ActivPAL monitor.

Hinckson EA, Hopkins WG, Aminian S, Ross K.

Gait Posture. 2013 Sep;38(4):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Mar 31.

PMID:
23548581
16.

Comparison of two objective monitors for assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviors in bariatric surgery patients.

Unick JL, Bond DS, Jakicic JM, Vithiananthan S, Ryder BA, Roye GD, Pohl D, Trautvetter J, Wing RR.

Obes Surg. 2012 Mar;22(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0491-1.

17.

A comparison of energy expenditure estimates from the Actiheart and Actical physical activity monitors during low intensity activities, walking, and jogging.

Spierer DK, Hagins M, Rundle A, Pappas E.

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Apr;111(4):659-67. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1672-7. Epub 2010 Oct 17.

PMID:
20953878
18.

Recovery of physical activity levels in adolescents after lower limb fractures: a longitudinal, accelerometry-based activity monitor study.

Ceroni D, Martin X, Lamah L, Delhumeau C, Farpour-Lambert N, De Coulon G, Ferrière VD.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 25;13:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-131.

19.

Self-report vs. objectively assessed physical activity: which is right for public health?

Loney T, Standage M, Thompson D, Sebire SJ, Cumming S.

J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):62-70.

PMID:
21297186
20.

Objectively measured patterns of physical activity in primary school children in Coventry: the influence of ethnicity.

Eyre EL, Duncan MJ, Smith EC, Matyka KA.

Diabet Med. 2013 Aug;30(8):939-45. doi: 10.1111/dme.12186. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

PMID:
23510159
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk