Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes.

Cınar Y, Cingü AK, Sahin M, Sahin A, Yüksel H, Türkcü FM, Cınar T, Caça I.

J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:481238. doi: 10.1155/2013/481238. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

2.

Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population.

Gursoy H, Sahin A, Basmak H, Ozer A, Yildirim N, Colak E.

Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Aug;88(8):912-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821cc4d6.

PMID:
21552178
3.

[Precision of a new device for biometric measurements in pseudophakic eyes].

Hildebrandt AL, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP.

Ophthalmologe. 2011 Aug;108(8):739-44. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2373-2. German.

PMID:
21607812
4.

Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.

Zhao J, Chen Z, Zhou Z, Ding L, Zhou X.

Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):92-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00793.x. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

5.

Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer.

Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De Brabander J, Nuijts RM.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;94(1):106-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161729. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

PMID:
19692383
6.

Repeatability and reproducibility of a new optical biometer in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Yağcı R, Güler E, Kulak AE, Erdoğan BD, Balcı M, Hepşen İF.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.039.

PMID:
25532643
7.

Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS 900 and the Pentacam.

Uçakhan OÖ, Akbel V, Bıyıklı Z, Kanpolat A.

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul-Sep;20(3):201-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.114791.

8.

Comparison of partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound for anterior segment biometry.

Lara F, Fernández-Sánchez V, López-Gil N, Cerviño A, Montés-Micó R.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Feb;35(2):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.038.

PMID:
19185250
9.

Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measured using LenStar LS900, Pentacam, and Visante AS-OCT.

OʼDonnell C, Hartwig A, Radhakrishnan H.

Cornea. 2012 Sep;31(9):983-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8e2f.

PMID:
22367044
10.

Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability and reproducibility of slit-lamp-adapted optical coherence tomography for evaluation of anterior chamber depth and central corneal thickness.

Sandler SF, Zelefsky JR, Dorairaj S, Arthur SN, Ritch R, Liebmann JM.

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008 Jul-Aug;39(4):299-303.

PMID:
18717435
11.

Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.

Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2087-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

PMID:
19744720
12.

Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.

Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J, Büehren T.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.039.

14.

Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.

Chen W, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Wang Q, Lu F, Feng Y, Chen J, Huang J.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

PMID:
22763002
15.

[Ocular biometry in children with hypermetropia: utility of the Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer (Haag-Streit(®))].

Loudot C, Zanin E, Fogliarini C, Boulze M, Souchon L, Denis D.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 Jun;34(6):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 May 7. French.

16.

Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconic eyes using rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning-slit topography.

Naderan M, Shoar S, Naderan M, Kamaleddin MA, Rajabi MT.

Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 18;8(2):275-80. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.11. eCollection 2015.

17.

Ocular biometry in angle closure.

Razeghinejad MR, Banifatemi M.

J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013 Jan;8(1):17-24.

18.

Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography.

Fukuda S, Kawana K, Yasuno Y, Oshika T.

Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):882-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.022.

PMID:
19410946
19.

Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.

Güler E, Kulak AE, Totan Y, Yuvarlak A, Hepşen İF.

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Jun 22. pii: S1367-0484(16)30047-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.06.001. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27344235
20.

[Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer].

Chiseliţă D, Cantemir A, Gălăţanu C, Irod A.

Oftalmologia. 2011;55(4):104-10. Romanian.

PMID:
22642145
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk