Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research.

Hunt KJ, Hurwit D.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):e118(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01476. Review.

PMID:
23965711
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?

Button G, Pinney S.

Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Aug;25(8):521-5.

PMID:
15363371
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.

SooHoo NF, Vyas R, Samimi D.

Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Nov;27(11):930-4.

PMID:
17144955
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes.

Baumhauer JF, Nawoczenski DA, DiGiovanni BF, Wilding GE.

Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Dec;27(12):1014-9.

PMID:
17207425
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.

Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK.

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;46(2):65-74.

PMID:
17331864
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing.

Hung M, Nickisch F, Beals TC, Greene T, Clegg DO, Saltzman CL.

Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Aug;33(8):621-6.

PMID:
22995227
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Evaluation of the validity of the Foot Function Index in measuring outcomes in patients with foot and ankle disorders.

SooHoo NF, Samimi DB, Vyas RM, Botzler T.

Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jan;27(1):38-42.

PMID:
16442027
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.

Lau JT, Mahomed NM, Schon LC.

Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Jun;26(6):479-82.

PMID:
15960915
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86-A(5):902-9.

PMID:
15118030
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?

Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Rippstein PF.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):815-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1036-y. Epub 2009 Aug 12. Review.

PMID:
19672670
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

Comparison of different outcome instruments following foot and ankle trauma.

Goldstein CL, Schemitsch E, Bhandari M, Mathew G, Petrisor BA.

Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Dec;31(12):1075-80. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.1075.

PMID:
21189208
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery.

Parker J, Nester CJ, Long AF, Barrie J.

Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Jan;24(1):56-60.

PMID:
12540083
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.

Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, Lee MJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d. Review.

PMID:
21952190
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Quality of research and level of evidence in foot and ankle publications.

Barske HL, Baumhauer J.

Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jan;33(1):1-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0001.

PMID:
22381229
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle with matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation: early clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results.

Aurich M, Bedi HS, Smith PJ, Rolauffs B, M├╝ckley T, Clayton J, Blackney M.

Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):311-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546510381575. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

PMID:
21068444
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery.

Malviya A, Makwana N, Laing P.

Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Apr;28(4):494-8.

PMID:
17475146
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.

DeVine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney DR, Vaccaro A, Wang J, Andersson G.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef6de. Review.

PMID:
21897347
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis.

Madeley NJ, Wing KJ, Topliss C, Penner MJ, Glazebrook MA, Younger AS.

Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jan;33(1):57-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0057.

PMID:
22381237
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

The ability of outcome questionnaires to capture patient concerns following ankle reconstruction.

Pinsker E, Daniels TR, Inrig T, Warmington K, Beaton DE.

Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):65-74. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460365.

PMID:
23386763
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Radiofrequency coblation for chronic foot and ankle tendinosis.

Yeap EJ, Chong KW, Yeo W, Rikhraj IS.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009 Dec;17(3):325-30.

PMID:
20065374
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk