Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study.

Persson J, Wilderäng U, Jiborn T, Wiklund PN, Damber JE, Hugosson J, Steineck G, Haglind E, Bjartell A.

Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):160-7. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.820788. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

PMID:
23906418
2.

Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Evans AJ, Henry PC, Van der Kwast TH, Tkachuk DC, Watson K, Lockwood GA, Fleshner NE, Cheung C, Belanger EC, Amin MB, Boccon-Gibod L, Bostwick DG, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Grignon DJ, Jones EC, Montironi R, Moussa M, Sweet JM, Trpkov K, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Oct;32(10):1503-12. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31817fb3a0.

PMID:
18708939
3.

A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.

J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17936849
4.

Discrepancy between local and central pathological review of radical prostatectomy specimens.

Kuroiwa K, Shiraishi T, Ogawa O, Usami M, Hirao Y, Naito S; Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer Investigators.

J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):952-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.024. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

PMID:
20083260
5.

Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.

Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Gustafsson O, Hugosson J, Bjartell A, Wilderäng U, Wiklund NP, Steineck G, Haglind E; LAPPRO steering committee.

Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 11.

PMID:
25308968
6.

The surgical approach can be determined from the pathological specimen obtained after open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Drouin SJ, Comperat E, Varinot J, Vaessen C, Bitker MO, Chartier-Kastler E, Mozer P, Shariat SF, Cussenot O, Rouprêt M.

World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):489-93. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1107-2. Epub 2013 May 31.

PMID:
23723015
7.

Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.

Koutlidis N, Mourey E, Champigneulle J, Mangin P, Cormier L.

Int J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03102.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

8.

Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911).

van der Kwast TH, Collette L, Van Poppel H, Van Cangh P, Vekemans K, DaPozzo L, Bosset JF, Kurth KH, Schröder FH, Bolla M; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Genito-Urinary Cancer Groups.

Virchows Arch. 2006 Oct;449(4):428-34. Epub 2006 Aug 29.

PMID:
16941153
9.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.

Koo KC, Tuliao P, Yoon YE, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Yang SC, Rha KH.

Int J Urol. 2014 Aug;21(8):781-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12447. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

10.

The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.

Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD.

Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.

PMID:
18405448
11.

The value of second-opinion pathology diagnoses on prostate biopsies from patients referred for management of prostate cancer.

Barqawi AB, Turcanu R, Gamito EJ, Lucia SM, O'Donnell CI, Crawford ED, La Rosa DD, La Rosa FG.

Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011 Jun 20;4(5):468-75. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

12.

Interobserver variability in histologic evaluation of radical prostatectomy between central and local pathologists: findings of TAX 3501 multinational clinical trial.

Netto GJ, Eisenberger M, Epstein JI; TAX 3501 Trial Investigators.

Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.031. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

13.

The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG.

J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18635217
14.

A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.

Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G.

J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

PMID:
17561160
15.

Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.

Albadine R, Hyndman ME, Chaux A, Jeong JY, Saab S, Tavora F, Epstein JI, Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Netto GJ.

Hum Pathol. 2012 Feb;43(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

PMID:
21820147
16.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy.

Chino J, Schroeck FR, Sun L, Lee WR, Albala DM, Moul JW, Koontz BF.

BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(10):1496-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08588.x. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

17.

Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Baumgartner R, Phillips S, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr.

J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

PMID:
20083261
18.

Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.

Manoharan M, Bird VG, Kim SS, Civantos F, Soloway MS.

BJU Int. 2003 Oct;92(6):539-44.

19.

Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.

Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su LM, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, Han M, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(12):1956-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09795.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

20.

Can single positive core prostate cancer at biopsy be considered a low-risk disease after radical prostatectomy?

Ricardo Kupka da S, Dall'Oglio MF, Sant'Ana AC, Pontes J Jr, Srougi M.

Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):800-7. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.06.05.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk