Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 158

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23895129)

1.

Microarray-based prenatal diagnosis for the identification of fetal chromosome abnormalities.

Shaffer LG, Rosenfeld JA.

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013 Jul;13(6):601-11. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2013.811912. Review.

PMID:
23895129
2.

Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.

Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG.

Prenat Diagn. 2009 Dec;29(12):1156-66. doi: 10.1002/pd.2371.

PMID:
19795450
3.

Genomic microarrays: a technology overview.

Brady PD, Vermeesch JR.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):336-43. doi: 10.1002/pd.2933. Review.

PMID:
22467164
4.

Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011.

Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, Bernardini L, Bizzoco D, Camurri L, Casalone R, Cardarelli L, Cavalli P, Ciccone R, Clementi M, Dalprà L, Gentile M, Gelli G, Grammatico P, Malacarne M, Nardone AM, Pecile V, Simoni G, Zuffardi O, Giardino D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;39(4):384-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.11092. Review.

5.

Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies.

Langlois S, Duncan A.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Sep;33(9):955-60. Review.

PMID:
21923994
6.

Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.

Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, Ballif BC, Eng CM, Zachary JM, Savage M, Platt LD, Saltzman D, Grobman WA, Klugman S, Scholl T, Simpson JL, McCall K, Aggarwal VS, Bunke B, Nahum O, Patel A, Lamb AN, Thom EA, Beaudet AL, Ledbetter DH, Shaffer LG, Jackson L.

N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382.

7.

Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, McMullan DJ, Davison EV, Maher ER, Kilby MD.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):6-14. doi: 10.1002/uog.7754. Review.

8.

[Advances in rapid prenatal detection of fetal chromosome abnormalities].

Wang J, Cui YX.

Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010 Apr;16(4):359-63. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
20626168
9.

Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies.

Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, Coppinger J, Bandholz AM, Ellison JW, Ravnan JB, Torchia BS, Ballif BC, Rosenfeld JA.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Oct;32(10):976-85. doi: 10.1002/pd.3945. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

10.

Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dhillon RK, Hillman SC, Morris RK, McMullan D, Williams D, Coomarasamy A, Kilby MD.

BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12382. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Review.

PMID:
23859082
11.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis.

Mademont-Soler I, Morales C, Soler A, Martínez-Crespo JM, Shen Y, Margarit E, Clusellas N, Obón M, Wu BL, Sánchez A.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):375-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.12372. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

12.

Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?

Bejjani BA, Saleki R, Ballif BC, Rorem EA, Sundin K, Theisen A, Kashork CD, Shaffer LG.

Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Apr 30;134(3):259-67.

PMID:
15723295
13.

Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Fiorentino F, Napoletano S, Caiazzo F, Sessa M, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Gordon A, Nuccitelli A, Rizzo G, Baldi M.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jul;21(7):725-30. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.253. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

14.

Prenatal cytogenetic abnormalities: correlations of structural rearrangements and ultrasonographically detected fetal anomalies.

Hume RF Jr, Kilmer-Ernst P, Wolfe HM, Ebrahim SA, Treadwell MC, Johnson MP, Evans MI.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;173(4):1334-6.

PMID:
7485349
15.

Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review.

Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Williams D, Maher ER, Kilby MD.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;40(4):385-91. doi: 10.1002/uog.11180. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Review.

16.

Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.

Fruhman G, Van den Veyver IB.

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010 Mar;37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2010.02.001. Review.

PMID:
20494259
17.

Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.

Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese Martin C.

Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Jun;74(6):1168-74. Epub 2004 May 4.

18.

Structural chromosomal anomalies detected by prenatal genetic diagnosis: our experience.

Farcaş S, Crişan CD, Andreescu N, Stoian M, Motoc AG.

Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2013;54(2):377-83.

19.

Comparative genomic hybridization by microarray for the detection of cytogenetic imbalance.

Jarmuz M, Ballif BC, Kashork CD, Theisen AP, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG.

Methods Mol Med. 2006;128:23-31.

PMID:
17071987
20.

Oligonucleotide microarrays in constitutional genetic diagnosis.

Keren B, Le Caignec C.

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011 Jun;11(5):521-32. doi: 10.1586/ERM.11.32. Review.

PMID:
21707460
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk