Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

1.

Prussian blue nanoparticles operate as a contrast agent for enhanced photoacoustic imaging.

Liang X, Deng Z, Jing L, Li X, Dai Z, Li C, Huang M.

Chem Commun (Camb). 2013 Dec 7;49(94):11029-31. doi: 10.1039/c3cc42510j.

PMID:
23884328
2.

Prussian blue coated gold nanoparticles for simultaneous photoacoustic/CT bimodal imaging and photothermal ablation of cancer.

Jing L, Liang X, Deng Z, Feng S, Li X, Huang M, Li C, Dai Z.

Biomaterials. 2014 Jul;35(22):5814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

PMID:
24746962
3.

Upconversion nanoparticles as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging in live mice.

Maji SK, Sreejith S, Joseph J, Lin M, He T, Tong Y, Sun H, Yu SW, Zhao Y.

Adv Mater. 2014 Aug 27;26(32):5633-8. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400831. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

PMID:
24913756
4.

PEGylated Prussian blue nanocubes as a theranostic agent for simultaneous cancer imaging and photothermal therapy.

Cheng L, Gong H, Zhu W, Liu J, Wang X, Liu G, Liu Z.

Biomaterials. 2014 Dec;35(37):9844-52. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

PMID:
25239041
5.

Gold nanocages as contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging.

Li W, Brown PK, Wang LV, Xia Y.

Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;6(5):370-7. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.439. Review.

PMID:
22025337
6.

Perylene-diimide-based nanoparticles as highly efficient photoacoustic agents for deep brain tumor imaging in living mice.

Fan Q, Cheng K, Yang Z, Zhang R, Yang M, Hu X, Ma X, Bu L, Lu X, Xiong X, Huang W, Zhao H, Cheng Z.

Adv Mater. 2015 Feb 4;27(5):843-7. doi: 10.1002/adma.201402972. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

7.

Molecular photoacoustic tomography of breast cancer using receptor targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents.

Xi L, Grobmyer SR, Zhou G, Qian W, Yang L, Jiang H.

J Biophotonics. 2014 Jun;7(6):401-9. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201200155. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

8.

Biocompatible polypyrrole nanoparticles as a novel organic photoacoustic contrast agent for deep tissue imaging.

Zha Z, Deng Z, Li Y, Li C, Wang J, Wang S, Qu E, Dai Z.

Nanoscale. 2013 May 21;5(10):4462-7. doi: 10.1039/c3nr00627a.

PMID:
23584573
9.

Gold nanoparticles as a contrast agent for in vivo tumor imaging with photoacoustic tomography.

Zhang Q, Iwakuma N, Sharma P, Moudgil BM, Wu C, McNeill J, Jiang H, Grobmyer SR.

Nanotechnology. 2009 Sep 30;20(39):395102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/39/395102. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

PMID:
19726840
10.

Multifunctional microbubbles and nanobubbles for photoacoustic imaging.

Xu RX.

Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;6(5):401-11. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.442. Review.

PMID:
22025340
11.

Manganese-containing Prussian blue nanoparticles for imaging of pediatric brain tumors.

Dumont MF, Yadavilli S, Sze RW, Nazarian J, Fernandes R.

Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 May 23;9:2581-95. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S63472. eCollection 2014.

12.

Copper sulfide nanoparticles as a new class of photoacoustic contrast agent for deep tissue imaging at 1064 nm.

Ku G, Zhou M, Song S, Huang Q, Hazle J, Li C.

ACS Nano. 2012 Aug 28;6(8):7489-96. doi: 10.1021/nn302782y. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

13.

Mn2+-doped prussian blue nanocubes for bimodal imaging and photothermal therapy with enhanced performance.

Zhu W, Liu K, Sun X, Wang X, Li Y, Cheng L, Liu Z.

ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Jun 3;7(21):11575-82. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b02510. Epub 2015 May 20.

PMID:
25965554
14.

Shining light on the dark side of imaging: excited state absorption enhancement of a bis-styryl BODIPY photoacoustic contrast agent.

Frenette M, Hatamimoslehabadi M, Bellinger-Buckley S, Laoui S, La J, Bag S, Mallidi S, Hasan T, Bouma B, Yelleswarapu C, Rochford J.

J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Nov 12;136(45):15853-6. doi: 10.1021/ja508600x. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

15.

Nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging.

Yang X, Stein EW, Ashkenazi S, Wang LV.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2009 Jul-Aug;1(4):360-8. doi: 10.1002/wnan.42. Review.

PMID:
20049803
16.

Biofunctionalized gadolinium-containing prussian blue nanoparticles as multimodal molecular imaging agents.

Dumont MF, Hoffman HA, Yoon PR, Conklin LS, Saha SR, Paglione J, Sze RW, Fernandes R.

Bioconjug Chem. 2014 Jan 15;25(1):129-37. doi: 10.1021/bc4004266. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

PMID:
24328306
17.

Quantitative photoacoustic imaging of nanoparticles in cells and tissues.

Cook JR, Frey W, Emelianov S.

ACS Nano. 2013 Feb 26;7(2):1272-80. doi: 10.1021/nn304739s. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

18.

Photoacoustic contrast imaging of biological tissues with nanodiamonds fabricated for high near-infrared absorbance.

Zhang T, Cui H, Fang CY, Su LJ, Ren S, Chang HC, Yang X, Forrest ML.

J Biomed Opt. 2013 Feb;18(2):26018. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.026018.

19.

Photoacoustic tomography of a rat cerebral cortex in vivo with au nanocages as an optical contrast agent.

Yang X, Skrabalak SE, Li ZY, Xia Y, Wang LV.

Nano Lett. 2007 Dec;7(12):3798-802. Epub 2007 Nov 20.

PMID:
18020475
20.

Gold nanorods as molecular contrast agents in photoacoustic imaging: the promises and the caveats.

Manohar S, Ungureanu C, Van Leeuwen TG.

Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;6(5):389-400. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.454. Review.

PMID:
22025339
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk