Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 90

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23868866)

1.

A structured judgement method to enhance mortality case note review: development and evaluation.

Hutchinson A, Coster JE, Cooper KL, Pearson M, McIntosh A, Bath PA.

BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):1032-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001839. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

PMID:
23868866
2.

Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care.

Hutchinson A, Coster JE, Cooper KL, McIntosh A, Walters SJ, Bath PA, Pearson M, Young TA, Rantell K, Campbell MJ, Ratcliffe J.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(10):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta14100.

3.

Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase.

Benning A, Dixon-Woods M, Nwulu U, Ghaleb M, Dawson J, Barber N, Franklin BD, Girling A, Hemming K, Carmalt M, Rudge G, Naicker T, Kotecha A, Derrington MC, Lilford R.

BMJ. 2011 Feb 3;342:d199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d199.

4.

Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care.

Weingart SN, Mukamal K, Davis RB, Davies DT Jr, Palmer RH, Cahalane M, Hamel MB, Phillips RS, Iezzoni LI.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Oct;13(5):357-65.

5.

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.

Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D, Bond GR, Huxley P, Tyrer P.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. Review.

6.

Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates.

Guru V, Tu JV, Etchells E, Anderson GM, Naylor CD, Novick RJ, Feindel CM, Rubens FD, Teoh K, Mathur A, Hamilton A, Bonneau D, Cutrara C, Austin PC, Fremes SE.

Circulation. 2008 Jun 10;117(23):2969-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.722249.

7.
8.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
9.

[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Amato L, Colais P, Davoli M, Ferroni E, Fusco D, Minozzi S, Moirano F, Sciattella P, Vecchi S, Ventura M, Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Review. Italian.

PMID:
23851286
10.

Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality.

Weingart SN, Davis RB, Palmer RH, Cahalane M, Hamel MB, Mukamal K, Phillips RS, Davies DT Jr, Iezzoni LI.

Health Serv Res. 2002 Apr;37(2):483-98.

11.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
12.

The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.

McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

PMID:
19744291
13.

Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.

Hofer TP, Bernstein SJ, DeMonner S, Hayward RA.

Med Care. 2000 Feb;38(2):152-61.

PMID:
10659689
14.

Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?

Hofer TP, Asch SM, Hayward RA, Rubenstein LV, Hogan MM, Adams J, Kerr EA.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 May 19;4(1):9.

15.

Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1.

16.

The quality of procedural rural medical practice in Australia.

Hays RB, Evans RJ, Veitch C.

Rural Remote Health. 2005 Oct-Dec;5(4):474. Epub 2005 Oct 11.

17.

Evaluating the care of general medicine inpatients: how good is implicit review?

Hayward RA, McMahon LF Jr, Bernard AM.

Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 1;118(7):550-6.

PMID:
8442625
18.

Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.

Blum AB, Shea S, Czeisler CA, Landrigan CP, Leape L.

Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.

19.

Use of the Rand Structured Implicit Review Instrument for Quality of Care Assessment.

Lefevre F, Feinglass J, Yarnold PR, Martin GJ, Webster J.

Am J Med Sci. 1993 Apr;305(4):222-8.

PMID:
8475947
20.

Explicit versus implicit review to explore combination antipsychotic prescribing.

Wheeler A.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):685-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01084.x.

PMID:
19674220
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk