Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 88

1.

Robotic assistance enables inexperienced surgeons to perform unicompartmental knee arthroplasties on dry bone models with accuracy superior to conventional methods.

Karia M, Masjedi M, Andrews B, Jaffry Z, Cobb J.

Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:481039. doi: 10.1155/2013/481039. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

PMID:
23862069
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article
2.

Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.

Moon YW, Ha CW, Do KH, Kim CY, Han JH, Na SE, Lee CH, Kim JG, Park YS.

Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.

PMID:
22348661
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: robot vs. patient specific instrumentation.

Jaffry Z, Masjedi M, Clarke S, Harris S, Karia M, Andrews B, Cobb J.

Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

PMID:
24342544
[PubMed - in process]
4.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique?

Citak M, Suero EM, Citak M, Dunbar NJ, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA, Pearle AD.

Knee. 2013 Aug;20(4):268-71. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

PMID:
23201147
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.

Jung KA, Kim SJ, Lee SC, Hwang SH, Ahn NK.

Knee. 2010 Dec;17(6):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Nov 28.

PMID:
19945880
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

High Degree of Accuracy of a Novel Image-free Handheld Robot for Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in a Cadaveric Study.

Lonner JH, Smith JR, Picard F, Hamlin B, Rowe PJ, Riches PE.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul 8. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25002214
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
7.

Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5. Epub 2009 Jul 11.

PMID:
19593669
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

Computer-assisted FluoroGuide navigation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Ma B, Rudan J, Chakravertty R, Grant H.

Can J Surg. 2009 Oct;52(5):379-85.

PMID:
19865572
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.

Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):236-43.

PMID:
17272435
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Computer-assisted surgery for subtalar arthrodesis. A study in cadavers.

Easley M, Chuckpaiwong B, Cooperman N, Schuh R, Ogut T, Le IL, Reach J.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Aug;90(8):1628-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00513.

PMID:
18676891
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA.

Kim SM, Park YS, Ha CW, Lim SJ, Moon YW.

Orthopedics. 2012 Sep;35(9):e1334-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120822-18.

PMID:
22955398
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement.

Smith JR, Riches PE, Rowe PJ.

Int J Med Robot. 2014 Jun;10(2):162-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1522. Epub 2013 Aug 11.

PMID:
23934937
[PubMed - in process]
14.

Accuracy of dynamic tactile-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Dunbar NJ, Roche MW, Park BH, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA.

J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):803-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

PMID:
22088782
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Mofidi A, Plate JF, Lu B, Conditt MA, Lang JE, Poehling GG, Jinnah RH.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1918-25. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

PMID:
24744171
[PubMed - in process]
16.

Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.

Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, Ward WG, Jinnah RH.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Aug;90 Suppl 3:71-80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00697.

PMID:
18676940
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Tibial component rotation assessment using CT scan in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Servien E, Fary C, Lustig S, Demey G, Saffarini M, Chomel S, Neyret P.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 May;97(3):272-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

PMID:
21315677
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.

Does a minimally invasive approach affect positioning of components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Early results with survivorship analysis.

Cool S, Victor J, De Baets T.

Acta Orthop Belg. 2006 Dec;72(6):709-15.

PMID:
17260608
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.

Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ.

Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

PMID:
19536599
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Plate JF, Mofidi A, Mannava S, Smith BP, Lang JE, Poehling GG, Conditt MA, Jinnah RH.

Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:837167. doi: 10.1155/2013/837167. Epub 2013 Mar 24.

PMID:
23634304
[PubMed]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk