Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 141

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23827799)

1.

Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.

Yano Y, Yabuuchi H, Tanaka N, Morishita J, Akasaka T, Matsuo Y, Sunami S, Kamitani T, Jinnouchi M, Yamasaki Y, Nagao M, Sasaki M.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):2050-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.036. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

PMID:
23827799
2.

Detectability of simulated interstitial pneumonia on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.

Yano Y, Yabuuchi H, Kairada A, Tanaka N, Morishita J, Akasaka T, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Yamasaki Y, Nagao M, Sasaki M.

Br J Radiol. 2014 Aug;87(1040):20140075. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140075. Epub 2014 May 29.

PMID:
24874767
3.

Flat-panel detector computed tomography imaging: observer performance in detecting pulmonary nodules in comparison with conventional chest radiography and multidetector computed tomography.

Otani H, Nitta N, Ikeda M, Nagatani Y, Tanaka T, Kitahara H, Murakami Y, Takahashi M, Murata K.

J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Jan;27(1):51-7. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31820321e2.

PMID:
21307781
4.

Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.

Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Aug;165(2):269-73.

PMID:
7618538
5.

Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.

Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Esseling R, Roehl FW, Schiborr M, Theobald-Hormann I, Heindel W.

Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):485-91. Epub 2005 Sep 16.

PMID:
16170012
6.

Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Metz S, Damoser P, Hollweck R, Roggel R, Engelke C, Woertler K, Renger B, Rummeny EJ, Link TM.

Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):776-84.

PMID:
15734933
7.

Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.

Oda S, Awai K, Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Yanaga Y, Kawanaka K, Yamashita Y.

Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Apr;28(3):214-9. doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0411-7. Epub 2010 May 1.

PMID:
20437132
8.

Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.

Oda S, Awai K, Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Yanaga Y, Kawanaka K, Nakaura T, Hirai T, Murakami R, Nomori H, Yamashita Y.

Clin Radiol. 2010 Aug;65(8):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.02.012.

PMID:
20599062
9.

Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.

Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.

Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):45-50.

PMID:
8816519
10.

Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Yin J, Guo Q, Zhang W, Su H, Zhang J, Yue Y, Ding C, Lin A, Wang Y, Wang H.

Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e549-55. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19867962. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

11.

Detection of simulated lung nodules with computed radiography: effects of nodule size, local optical density, global object thickness, and exposure.

Kimme-Smith C, Hart EM, Goldin JG, Johnson TD, Terwilliger R, Aberle DR.

Acad Radiol. 1996 Sep;3(9):735-41.

PMID:
8883514
12.

Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.

Lehnert T, Naguib NN, Wutzler S, Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Burkhard T, Schulz B, Larson MC, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ, Balzer JO.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Jan;49(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182a56654.

PMID:
24019019
13.

Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lung lesions.

Uffmann M, Prokop M, Eisenhuber E, Fuchsjäger M, Weber M, Schaefer-Prokop C.

Invest Radiol. 2005 May;40(5):249-56.

PMID:
15829821
14.

Development of a high-performance dual-energy chest imaging system: initial investigation of diagnostic performance.

Kashani H, Gang JG, Shkumat NA, Varon CA, Yorkston J, Van Metter R, Paul NS, Siewerdsen JH.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Apr;16(4):464-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.016.

15.

[Diagnostic detection performance of a simulated nodule in chest computed tomography images and gray and color nuclear medicine images: comparison between a medical liquid crystal display monitor and an ordinary liquid crystal display monitor].

Okumura E, Kamimae R, Miyashita K, Ueda R, Kanmae Y, Kubo M, Shirasaka N, Takeda T, Hashimoto N.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2014 Aug;70(8):757-67. Japanese.

16.

Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system.

Tanaka N, Yano Y, Yabuuchi H, Akasaka T, Sasaki M, Ohki M, Morishita J.

Radiol Phys Technol. 2013 Jan;6(1):162-9. doi: 10.1007/s12194-012-0184-z. Epub 2012 Nov 10.

PMID:
23143711
17.
18.
19.

Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.

Uemura M, Miyagawa M, Yasuhara Y, Murakami T, Ikura H, Sakamoto K, Tagashira H, Arakawa K, Mochizuki T.

Radiat Med. 2005 Sep;23(6):391-7.

PMID:
16389980
20.

CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: results of an international multicenter trial.

Rühl R, Wozniak MM, Werk M, Laurent F, Mager G, Montaudon M, Pattermann A, Scherrer A, Tasu JP, Pech M, Ricke J.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):1831-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0945-6. Epub 2008 Apr 19. Erratum in: Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2355.

PMID:
18425520
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk