Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 312

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23820228)

1.

Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.

Lim DH, Keum JE, Ju WK, Lee JH, Chung TY, Chung ES.

J Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;29(7):462-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-04.

PMID:
23820228
2.

LASIK for myopia using the Zeiss VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser.

Blum M, Kunert K, Gille A, Sekundo W.

J Refract Surg. 2009 Apr;25(4):350-6.

PMID:
19431925
3.

Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.

Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Johnson N.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):107-19. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

PMID:
20163075
4.

Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.

Cummings AB, Cummings BK, Kelly GE.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;39(3):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

PMID:
23352500
5.

Safety and effectiveness of thin-flap LASIK using a femtosecond laser and microkeratome in the correction of high myopia in Chinese patients.

Li H, Sun T, Wang M, Zhao J.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):99-106. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-05. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

PMID:
20163074
6.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser platforms in contralateral eyes.

Rosman M, Hall RC, Chan C, Ang A, Koh J, Htoon HM, Tan DT, Mehta JS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;39(7):1066-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.038. Epub 2013 May 13.

PMID:
23680627
7.

Thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond-laser technology.

Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Grentzelos MA, Panagopoulou SI, Stojanovic N, Kankariya VP, Henderson BA, Pallikaris IG.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1366-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

PMID:
23820304
8.

A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.

Prakash G, Agarwal A, Yadav A, Jacob S, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Akhtar R.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;26(6):392-402. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090728-02. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

PMID:
20677726
9.

Femtosecond sub-bowman keratomileusis: a prospective, long-term, intereye comparison of safety and outcomes of 90- versus 100-μm flaps.

Prakash G, Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Chari M, Agarwal A, Jacob S, Srivastava D.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;152(4):582-590.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

PMID:
21683336
10.

Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia.

Wang QM, Fu AC, Yu Y, Xu CC, Wang XX, Chen SH, Yu AY.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2390-4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0827.

PMID:
18515581
11.

Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.

He L, Liu A, Manche EE.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;157(6):1170-1178.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.037. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

PMID:
24560995
12.

Prospective, contralateral comparison of 120-μm and 90-μm LASIK flaps using the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser.

Moshirfar M, Hatch BB, Chang JC, Kurz CJ, Eugarrios MF, Mifflin MD.

J Refract Surg. 2011 Apr;27(4):251-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100624-01. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

PMID:
20672771
13.

Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.

Kalyvianaki MI, Kymionis GD, Kounis GA, Panagopoulou SI, Grentzelos MA, Pallikaris IG.

Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.025.

PMID:
19041475
14.

Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.

Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Javaloy J, García-Lázaro S.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.027.

PMID:
22153090
15.

Longitudinal comparison of outcomes after sub-Bowman keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis: randomized, double-masked study.

Wong RC, Yu M, Chan TC, Chong KK, Jhanji V.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 May;159(5):835-45.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

PMID:
25681001
16.

A retrospective comparison of efficacy and safety of 680 consecutive lasik treatments for high myopia performed with two generations of flying-spot excimer lasers.

Gazieva L, Beer MH, Nielsen K, Hjortdal J.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;89(8):729-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01830.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

PMID:
20102346
17.

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Rocha KM, Krueger RR.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;158(2):293-301.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

PMID:
24792107
18.

Outcomes for Myopic LASIK With the MEL 90 excimer laser.

Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Lewis TA, Archer TJ, Gobbe M.

J Refract Surg. 2015 May;31(5):316-21. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150423-05.

PMID:
25974970
19.

Femtosecond laser flap parameters and visual outcomes in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Issa A, Al Hassany U.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Apr;37(4):665-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.049.

PMID:
21420591
20.

Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.

Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba Mosquera S.

J Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;27(1):38-48. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100406-01. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

PMID:
20438023
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk