Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Radiological measurement of femoral stem version using a modified Budin method.

Lee YK, Kim TY, Ha YC, Kang BJ, Koo KH.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):877-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31195.

PMID:
23814236
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component.

Nho JH, Lee YK, Kim HJ, Ha YC, Suh YS, Koo KH.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):32-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27621.

PMID:
22219244
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Validity and reliability of measuring femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle in patients with cerebral palsy.

Chung CY, Lee KM, Park MS, Lee SH, Choi IH, Cho TJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May;92(5):1195-205. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00688.

PMID:
20439666
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method.

Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS.

Hip Int. 2009 Oct-Dec;19(4):377-81.

PMID:
20041386
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem.

Kosiyatrakul A, Luenam S, Chotanaphuti T.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Dec;92 Suppl 6:S128-33.

PMID:
20120674
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty.

Müller M, Crucius D, Perka C, Tohtz S.

Int Orthop. 2011 Jul;35(7):981-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1047-z. Epub 2010 Jun 13.

PMID:
20549502
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Dorr LD, Wan Z, Malik A, Zhu J, Dastane M, Deshmane P.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2598-604. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01225.

PMID:
19884433
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty.

Wines AP, McNicol D.

J Arthroplasty. 2006 Aug;21(5):696-701.

PMID:
16877155
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Intraoperative estimation of femoral anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the lesser trochanter.

Unlu MC, Kesmezacar H, Kantarci F, Unlu B, Botanlioglu H.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Sep;131(9):1317-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1282-9. Epub 2011 Feb 27.

PMID:
21359870
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs.

Nomura T, Naito M, Nakamura Y, Ida T, Kuroda D, Kobayashi T, Sakamoto T, Seo H.

Bone Joint J. 2014 May;96-B(5):597-603. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B.33013.

PMID:
24788492
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA.

Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, Della Valle AG.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2362-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0774-1. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

PMID:
19277802
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement.

Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J.

Eur J Radiol. 2006 May;58(2):294-300. Epub 2005 Nov 11.

PMID:
16289687
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur.

Emerson RH Jr.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):477-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1993-9.

PMID:
21786055
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone.

Journé A, Sadaka J, Bélicourt C, Sautet A.

Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2205-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1650-2. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

PMID:
22949124
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

Ultrasound-based computer navigation: an accurate measurement tool for determining combined anteversion?

Wassilew GI, Janz V, Heller MO, König C, Perka C, Südhoff I, Seeger JB, Hasart O.

Technol Health Care. 2012;20(6):535-43. doi: 10.3233/THC-2012-00699.

PMID:
23187019
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination.

Botser IB, Ozoude GC, Martin DE, Siddiqi AJ, Kuppuswami S, Domb BG.

Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

PMID:
22301362
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Lee YS, Oh SH, Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR.

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Oct;44(10):895-906. Epub 2006 Sep 29. Erratum in: Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007 Mar;45(3):325.

PMID:
17009027
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: a prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements.

Reikerås O, Gunderson RB.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Oct;97(6):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

PMID:
21889919
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.

Girard J, Krantz N, Bocquet D, Wavreille G, Migaud H.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Feb;27(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

PMID:
21925779
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option?

Pasquier G, Ducharne G, Ali ES, Giraud F, Mouttet A, Durante E.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Jun;96(4):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 May 14.

PMID:
20471935
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk