Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 106

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23812461)

1.

Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology.

Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Boulet S, Jamieson DJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1263-71. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829006d9.

2.

Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology.

Ricci G, Boscolo R, Martinelli M, Fischer-Tamaro L.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):908-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7cc47. No abstract available.

PMID:
24084560
3.

Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology.

Kamphuis EI, Hermans FJ, Mol BW.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):908. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7c1f6. No abstract available.

PMID:
24084559
4.

Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States.

Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Macaluso M, Reynolds MA, Wright VC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1144-53.

PMID:
15172846
5.

In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1.

6.

Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.

Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.

7.

Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.

Society of Obstetricians annd Gynaecologists of Canada, Okun N, Sierra S.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83.

PMID:
24444289
8.

Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.

Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford S, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.

9.

Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.

Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Flowers L, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Nov 2;61(7):1-23.

10.
11.

Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology.

Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A; Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC); Reproductive Endocrinology Infertility Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC).

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Mar;28(3):220-50. English, French.

PMID:
16650361
12.

Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group.

Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Pinborg A, Skjaerven R, Forman J, Gissler M, Nygren KG, Tiitinen A.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2545-53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det272. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

13.

Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas.

Dunietz GL, Holzman C, McKane P, Li C, Boulet SL, Todem D, Kissin DM, Copeland G, Bernson D, Sappenfield WM, Diamond MP.

Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):974-979.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

PMID:
25707336
14.

Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010.

Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ; National ART Surveillance System (NASS) Group.

JAMA. 2013 Dec 11;310(22):2426-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280924.

15.

Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis: ovulatory dysfunction versus tubal obstruction.

Grigorescu V, Zhang Y, Kissin DM, Sauber-Schatz E, Sunderam M, Kirby RS, Diop H, McKane P, Jamieson DJ.

Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.030. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

PMID:
24484993
16.

Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Fertil Steril. 2007 Jun;87(6):1253-66. Epub 2007 Feb 2. Erratum in: Fertil Steril. 2007 Oct;88(4):1020.

PMID:
17276436
17.

Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000.

Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Black D, Dean J, Bryant J, Chapman M.

Fertil Steril. 2005 Jun;83(6):1650-8.

PMID:
15950632
18.

Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttila V, Nygren KG, Hazekamp J, Bergh C.

Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):87-104. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms044. Epub 2012 Nov 14. Review.

19.

Infertility and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Messerlian C, Maclagan L, Basso O.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Jan;28(1):125-37. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des347. Epub 2012 Oct 5. Review.

20.

Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.

Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):922-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.049. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

PMID:
22763098
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk