Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Overtreatment in a see-and-treat approach to cervical intraepithelial lesions.

Bosgraaf RP, Mast PP, Struik-van der Zanden PH, Bulten J, Massuger LF, Bekkers RL.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1209-16. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318293ab22.

PMID:
23812454
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

"See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy.

Aue-Aungkul A, Punyawatanasin S, Natprathan A, Srisomboon J, Kietpeerakool C.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(7):1723-6.

PMID:
22126552
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Feasibility of the 'see and treat' approach in management of women with 'atypical squamous cell, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion' smears.

Kietpeerakool C, Cheewakriangkrai C, Suprasert P, Srisomboon J.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Jun;35(3):507-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00992.x.

PMID:
19527391
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?

Numnum TM, Kirby TO, Leath CA 3rd, Huh WK, Alvarez RD, Straughn JM Jr.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005 Jan;9(1):2-6.

PMID:
15870514
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.

Ferris DG, Hainer BL, Pfenninger JL, Zuber TJ.

J Fam Pract. 1996 Mar;42(3):253-7.

PMID:
8636676
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Overtreatment in a see-and-treat approach to cervical intraepithelial lesions.

Wiesenfeld U, Bouché C, Buonomo F, Scrimin F.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1304. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000030. No abstract available.

PMID:
24264701
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

A "See and Treat" approach for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology.

Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Khunamornpong S, Suprasert P, Phongnarisorn C, Siriaree S, Cheewakriangkrai C.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Aug;87(8):865-8.

PMID:
15471287
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

"See-and-treat" loop electrosurgical excision. Has the time come for a reassessment?

Irvin WP Jr, Andersen WA, Taylor PT Jr, Stoler MH, Rice LW.

J Reprod Med. 2002 Jul;47(7):569-74.

PMID:
12170535
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.

al-Nafussi A, Rebello G, al-Yusif R, McGoogan E.

J Clin Pathol. 2000 Jun;53(6):439-44.

PMID:
10911801
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

[Wait-and-see policy versus loop excision after two consecutive Pap-2 cervical smears: over time less surgery and an equivalent outcome; no substantial contribution to be expected from the detection of high risk human papillomavirus].

Bekkers RL, Hanselaar AG, Melchers WJ, van Schaik JH, Boonstra H, Massuger LF.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Feb 15;147(7):302-6. Dutch.

PMID:
12622008
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

An audit of standards of the 'see and treat' approach in women with a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Pap smears.

Kietpeerakool C, Buttura R, Srisomboon J.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jul;29(5):430-3. doi: 10.1080/01443610902903094.

PMID:
19603324
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Three-step versus "see-and-treat" approach in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in a low-resource country.

Li ZG, Qian de Y, Cen JM, Chen GD, Shu YH.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;106(3):202-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 May 27.

PMID:
19477446
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Colposcopic management of high-grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting 'see and treat'?

Errington CA, Roberts M, Tindle P, Michael E, Bulmer JN, Wadehra V.

Cytopathology. 2006 Dec;17(6):339-47.

PMID:
17168916
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Is direct large loop electric excision for the transformation zone reasonable in the investigation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical smears?

Ng KY, Chang CK, Chen J, Wang PH, Teng SW.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25(1):61-5.

PMID:
15053064
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

How can the overtreatment rate of "see and treat" approach be reduced in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology?

Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Khunamornpong S, Siriaunkgul S, Sukkawattananon W.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007 Apr-Jun;8(2):206-8.

PMID:
17696732
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.

The use of endocervical curettage in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or atypical squamous cells of unknown significance on Pap smear.

Miranda AD, Rodríguez R, Novoa DM, Rojas A, Pachón A, DiazGranados CA.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2006 Jul;10(3):146-50.

PMID:
16829753
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, after six months delay: a three-year experience in an Iranian university hospital.

Yarandi F, Shojaei H, Eftekhar Z, Izadi-Mood N.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;49(2):207-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00960.x.

PMID:
19432613
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.

Mayeaux EJ Jr, Harper MB, Abreo F, Pope JB, Phillips GS.

J Fam Pract. 1995 Jan;40(1):57-62.

PMID:
7807039
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk