Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 121

1.

Müllerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.

Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;25(4):293-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283632849. Review.

PMID:
23812381
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss.

Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Katano K, Suzumori N, Mizutani E.

Semin Reprod Med. 2011 Nov;29(6):514-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1293205. Epub 2011 Dec 8. Review.

PMID:
22161464
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Midline uterine defect size is correlated with miscarriage of euploid embryos in recurrent cases.

Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Kitaori T, Kumagai K, Suzuki S.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1983-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.097. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

PMID:
19249757
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Effect of prior birth and miscarriage frequency on the prevalence of acquired and congenital uterine anomalies in women with recurrent miscarriage: a cross-sectional study.

Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1916-22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.152. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

PMID:
23472945
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.

Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Mar;20(3):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.021. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

PMID:
20093084
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Uterine anomalies and pregnancy outcome following resectoscope metroplasty.

Zlopasa G, Skrablin S, Kalafatić D, Banović V, Lesin J.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;98(2):129-33. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

PMID:
17588572
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening.

Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S, Elson J, Regan L, Jurkovic D.

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;98(6):1099-103.

PMID:
11755560
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Does surgery improve live birth rates in patients with recurrent miscarriage caused by uterine anomalies?

Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Lin BL, Aoki K, Maruyama T, Nakatsuka M, Ozawa N, Sugi T, Takeshita T, Nishida M.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Feb;35(2):155-8. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2014.936839. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

PMID:
25058627
[PubMed - in process]
9.

Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications.

Maneschi F, Zupi E, Marconi D, Valli E, Romanini C, Mancuso S.

J Reprod Med. 1995 Oct;40(10):684-8.

PMID:
8551467
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage.

Salim R, Regan L, Woelfer B, Backos M, Jurkovic D.

Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):162-6.

PMID:
12525460
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.

Müllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population.

Dreisler E, Stampe Sørensen S.

Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.043. Epub 2014 May 27.

PMID:
24875399
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography.

Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;5(4):233-7.

PMID:
7600203
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
13.

No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study.

Gergolet M, Campo R, Verdenik I, Kenda Suster N, Gordts S, Gianaroli L.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 May;24(5):576-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

PMID:
22417666
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.

Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056. Review.

PMID:
21830244
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.

Propst AM, Hill JA 3rd.

Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341-50. Review.

PMID:
11355792
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment.

Heinonen PK.

J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 May;4(3):311-7.

PMID:
9154779
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies.

Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simón C, Pellicer A.

Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12(10):2277-81.

PMID:
9402295
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
18.

Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies.

Rackow BW, Arici A.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;19(3):229-37. Review.

PMID:
17495638
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus by sonohysterography eliminates the need for laparoscopy.

Alborzi S, Dehbashi S, Parsanezhad ME.

Fertil Steril. 2002 Jul;78(1):176-8.

PMID:
12095509
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

A classification of congenital uterine anomalies predicting pregnancy outcomes.

Takami M, Aoki S, Kurasawa K, Okuda M, Takahashi T, Hirahara F.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jul;93(7):691-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12400. Epub 2014 May 23.

PMID:
24773088
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk