Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Influence of artificial aging in marginal adaptation of mixed class V cavities.

Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, Barud HG, Pinto SC, Lima DM, Borges AH, de Campos EA, de Andrade MF.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Mar 1;14(2):316-9.

PMID:
23811666
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.

Souza-Junior EJ, Prieto LT, Araújo CT, Paulillo LA.

Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):195-204. doi: 10.2341/11-184L. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

PMID:
22313271
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.

Manhart J, Trumm C.

Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Dec;14(6):699-705. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0353-6. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

PMID:
19937075
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.

Casselli DS, Faria-e-Silva AL, Casselli H, Martins LR.

Gen Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):e408-12.

PMID:
23220321
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical cycling.

Casselli DS, Faria-e-Silva AL, Casselli H, Martins LR.

J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):68-73.

PMID:
23559115
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.

Bortolotto T, Doudou W, Kunzelmann KH, Krejci I.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1125-35. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0623-y. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

PMID:
22015462
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.

Stavridakis MM, Kakaboura AI, Ardu S, Krejci I.

Oper Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):515-23.

PMID:
17910230
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Sealing effectiveness of etch-and-rinse vs self-etching adhesives after water aging: influence of acid etching and NaOCl dentin pretreatment.

Monticelli F, Toledano M, Silva AS, Osorio E, Osorio R.

J Adhes Dent. 2008 Jun;10(3):183-8.

PMID:
18652266
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.

Rontani RM, Ducatti CH, Garcia-Godoy F, De Goes MF.

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000 Spring;24(3):205-9.

PMID:
11314144
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.

Medina AD, de Paula AB, de Fucio SB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA.

Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):672-8.

PMID:
23338259
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
11.

Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.

Hofmann N, Hunecke A.

Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):97-105.

PMID:
16536200
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.

Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0501-z. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

PMID:
21327799
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.

Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0619-7. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

PMID:
21947906
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Effect of chlorhexidine incorporation into dental adhesive resin on durability of resin-dentin bond.

Yiu CK, Hiraishi N, Tay FR, King NM.

J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(4):355-62. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a25674.

PMID:
22518385
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Scanning electron microscope analysis of internal adaptation of materials used for pulp protection under composite resin restorations.

Peliz MI, Duarte S Jr, Dinelli W.

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(2):118-28.

PMID:
16036128
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.

Salim S, Santini A, Husham A.

Prim Dent Care. 2006 Jul;13(3):107-11.

PMID:
16836814
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.

Li Q, Jepsen S, Albers HK, Eberhard J.

Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):250-7. Epub 2005 Aug 9.

PMID:
16084584
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.

Krejci I, Lutz F.

J Dent. 1991 Feb;19(1):24-32.

PMID:
1901872
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?

Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M.

J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):339-44.

PMID:
19058678
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.

Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Roulet J.

J Dent. 2000 Aug;28(6):399-405.

PMID:
10856804
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk