Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 147

1.

Pulse pressure variation is comparable with central venous pressure to guide fluid resuscitation in experimental hemorrhagic shock with endotoxemia.

Noel-Morgan J, Otsuki DA, Auler JO Jr, Fukushima JT, Fantoni DT.

Shock. 2013 Oct;40(4):303-11. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182a0ca00.

PMID:
23807247
2.

A comparison between pulse pressure variation and right end diastolic volume index as guides to resuscitation in a model of hemorrhagic shock in pigs.

de Oliveira MA, Otsuki DA, Noel-Morgan J, Leite VF, Fantoni DT, Auler JO Jr.

J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1225-32; discussion 1232. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b845e4.

PMID:
20009671
3.

Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.

Biais M, Calderon J, Pernot M, Barandon L, Couffinhal T, Ouattara A, Sztark F.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1101-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

PMID:
24060469
4.

The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de La Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Lefrant JY.

Intensive Care Med. 2010 Mar;36(3):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1686-y. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

PMID:
19847400
5.

Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.

He Z, Qiao H, Zhou W, Wang Y, Xu Z, Che X, Zhang J, Liang W.

J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):812-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1225-1. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

PMID:
21935687
6.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.

Renner J, Broch O, Duetschke P, Scheewe J, Höcker J, Moseby M, Jung O, Bein B.

Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108(1):108-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer371. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

7.

Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Lee JH, Kim JT, Yoon SZ, Lim YJ, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Kim CS.

Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):343-8. Epub 2007 Jul 9.

8.

Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review.

Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR, Ansermino JM.

Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1380-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a9557e. Review.

PMID:
24257389
9.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.

Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;29(2):64-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834b7d82.

PMID:
21946822
10.

Rapid flow rates for the resuscitation of hypovolemic shock.

Dula DJ, Lutz P, Vogel MF, Weaver BN.

Ann Emerg Med. 1985 Apr;14(4):303-6.

PMID:
3985440
11.

Assessment effect of central venous pressure in fluid resuscitation in the patients with shock: a multi-center retrospective research.

Hu B, Xiang H, Liang H, Yu L, Xu T, Yang JH, DU ZH, Li JG.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(10):1844-9.

12.

Jugular vein distensibility predicts fluid responsiveness in septic patients.

Guarracino F, Ferro B, Forfori F, Bertini P, Magliacano L, Pinsky MR.

Crit Care. 2014 Dec 5;18(6):647. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0647-1.

13.

Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach.

Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, Conte B, Mahjoub Y, Desebbe O, Pottecher J, Lakhal K, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Molinari N, Boulain T, Lefrant JY, Muller L; AzuRea Group.

Crit Care. 2014 Nov 4;18(6):587. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9.

14.

Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.

Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, Hanss R, Meybohm P, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Bein B.

Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):650-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181959864.

PMID:
19114894
15.

Cerebrovascular resuscitation after polytrauma and fluid restriction.

Earle SA, de Moya MA, Zuccarelli JE, Norenberg MD, Proctor KG.

J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Feb;204(2):261-75.

PMID:
17254930
16.

[Mean arterial pressure as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].

Qi H, Gu Q, Liu N, Zhang BY.

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Jan;25(1):32-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.01.009. Chinese.

17.

Determination of the optimal mean arterial pressure for postbleeding resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock in rats.

Li T, Zhu Y, Fang Y, Liu L.

Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):103-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823de24f.

PMID:
22094312
18.
19.

Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.

Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):64-8.

PMID:
17080001
20.

Dynamic and volumetric variables reliably predict fluid responsiveness in a porcine model with pleural effusion.

Broch O, Gruenewald M, Renner J, Meybohm P, Schöttler J, Heß K, Steinfath M, Bein B.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056267. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk