Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 96

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23754576)

1.

Phi-square Lexical Competition Database (Phi-Lex): an online tool for quantifying auditory and visual lexical competition.

Strand JF.

Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):148-58. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0356-8.

PMID:
23754576
2.

Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.

Strand JF, Sommers MS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1663-72. doi: 10.1121/1.3613930.

3.
4.

The interaction of lexical semantics and cohort competition in spoken word recognition: an fMRI study.

Zhuang J, Randall B, Stamatakis EA, Marslen-Wilson WD, Tyler LK.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):3778-90. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00046. Epub 2011 May 12.

PMID:
21563885
5.

How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.

Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.

Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):e52-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431.

PMID:
23416751
6.

Online lexical competition during spoken word recognition and word learning in children and adults.

Henderson L, Weighall A, Brown H, Gaskell G.

Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1668-85. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12067. Epub 2013 Feb 24.

PMID:
23432734
7.

Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

McMurray B, Samelson VM, Lee SH, Tomblin JB.

Cogn Psychol. 2010 Feb;60(1):1-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.003.

8.

Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.

Zhao J, Guo J, Zhou F, Shu H.

Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1761-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.054. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

PMID:
21382389
9.

Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Kirk KI, Prusick L, French B, Gotch C, Eisenberg LS, Young N.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jun;23(6):464-75. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.6.8.

10.

The effect of lexical frequency on spoken word recognition in young and older listeners.

Revill KP, Spieler DH.

Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):80-7. doi: 10.1037/a0024113. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

11.
12.
13.

[Overview of models on spoken word recognition].

Amano S.

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1999 Aug;70(3):228-40. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
10629920
14.

Got rhythm…for better and for worse. Cross-modal effects of auditory rhythm on visual word recognition.

Brochard R, Tassin M, Zagar D.

Cognition. 2013 May;127(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

PMID:
23454794
15.

The role of visual representations during the lexical access of spoken words.

Lewis G, Poeppel D.

Brain Lang. 2014 Jul;134:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 May 9.

16.

Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Kaiser AR, Kirk KI, Lachs L, Pisoni DB.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Apr;46(2):390-404.

17.

The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.

Richie C, Kewley-Port D.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Dec;51(6):1607-19. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0069). Epub 2008 Aug 11.

PMID:
18695021
18.

Orthographic consistency affects spoken word recognition at different grain-sizes.

Dich N.

J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Apr;43(2):141-8. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9247-5.

PMID:
23504558
19.

Standard-Chinese Lexical Neighborhood Test in normal-hearing young children.

Liu C, Liu S, Zhang N, Yang Y, Kong Y, Zhang L.

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;75(6):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

PMID:
21458862
20.

Word length and lexical competition: longer is the same as shorter.

Vitevitch MS, Stamer MK, Sereno JA.

Lang Speech. 2008;51(Pt 4):361-83.

PMID:
19348156
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk