Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Could cecal polyp detection rate be surrogate marker of cecal intubation and a indicator of colonoscopic competence.

Shaikh I, Iqbal N, Khan A, Tsavellas G.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):1011-2. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.78. No abstract available.

PMID:
23735922
2.

Polyp detection rates: a possible surrogate for colonoscopy competency in addition to cecal intubation.

Singh S.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1925; author reply 1925-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.349. No abstract available.

PMID:
23211860
3.

Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures.

Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):971-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.481.

PMID:
22764019
4.

Response to shaikh et Al.

Koch AD, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):1012-3. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.82. No abstract available.

PMID:
23735923
5.

An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim SJ, Kim JO, Ko BM, Hwangbo Y, Kim WH, Park DH, Lee SK, Park CH, Baek IH, Park DI, Park SJ, Ji JS, Jang BI, Jeen YT, Shin JE, Byeon JS, Eun CS, Han DS.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.018. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18279862
6.

Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.

Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, Nelligan G, Lucey MR, Gaumnitz EA.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

PMID:
19647242
7.

Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the EFFECT trial.

Harewood GC, Murray F, Winder S, Patchett S.

Ir J Med Sci. 2008 Sep;177(3):253-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-008-0161-z. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

PMID:
18584274
8.

Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.

Gromski MA, Miller CA, Lee SH, Park ES, Lee TH, Park SH, Chung IK, Kim SJ, Hwangbo Y.

Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1337-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2033-2. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

PMID:
22083333
9.

North of 100 and south of 500: where does the "sweet spot" of colonoscopic competence lie?

Vargo JJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):325-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.027. No abstract available.

PMID:
20152312
10.

In response to: Singh S, "Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees".

Gromski MA, Lee SH.

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2245-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2725-2. Epub 2013 Jan 5. No abstract available.

PMID:
23292565
11.

Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees.

Singh S.

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2243-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2723-4. Epub 2013 Jan 5.

PMID:
23292564
12.

The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees.

Sedlack RE.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1125-33, 1133.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.001.

PMID:
21111866
13.

Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.

Sedlack RE.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Aug;74(2):355-366.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Apr 23. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):729.

PMID:
21514931
14.

Objective longitudinal performance measurement using the Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: a step in the right direction.

Cohen J.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.032. No abstract available.

PMID:
21111867
15.

Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees.

Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW, Canto M, Sivak MV Jr.

Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jul;44(1):54-7.

PMID:
8836717
16.

Quality of colonoscopy by gastroenterology and surgical trainees.

Grimminger PP, Hölscher AH.

Endoscopy. 2012 Jul;44(7):716; author reply 716. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309388. Epub 2012 Jun 21. No abstract available.

PMID:
22723189
17.

Quality of colonoscopy: the real need is for universal quality measurement and common standards for certification and credentialing.

Elta G.

Endoscopy. 2011 Nov;43(11):933-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256965. Epub 2011 Nov 4. No abstract available.

PMID:
22057757
18.

The cap-assisted technique enhances colonoscopy training: prospective randomized study of six trainees.

Park SM, Lee SH, Shin KY, Heo J, Sung SH, Park SH, Choi SY, Lee DW, Park HG, Lee HS, Jeon SW, Kim SK, Jung MK.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2939-43. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

PMID:
22538693
19.

Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees.

Park HJ, Hong JH, Kim HS, Kim BR, Park SY, Jo KW, Kim JW.

BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jan 19;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-5.

20.

Evaluation of colonoscopy skills - how well are we doing?

Mohamed R, Shaheen AA, Raman M.

Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;25(4):198-200.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk