Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 104

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23730779)

1.

AOTJ celebrates 10 years of critically appraised papers.

McCluskey A.

Aust Occup Ther J. 2013 Jun;60(3):153. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12056. No abstract available.

PMID:
23730779
2.

A time for sharing ...

O'Reilly N.

Aust Occup Ther J. 2008 Sep;55(3):151. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.767_1.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
20887456
3.

A look inside the Pharos review process.

Harris ED Jr.

Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2003 Spring;66(2):36-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
12838637
4.

Writing and publishing scientific papers.

El-Serag HB.

Gastroenterology. 2012 Feb;142(2):197-200. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.021. Epub 2011 Dec 16. No abstract available.

PMID:
22178211
5.

Publishing and getting published.

Gardner G.

Collegian. 2003 Jan;10(1):4-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
15534956
6.

Changes in JAPhA's peer review system.

Posey LM.

J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002 Jan-Feb;42(1):8-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
11833522
7.

JADA Industry Advisory Board.

Yeager AL.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Oct;133(10):1322, 1324; author reply 1324. No abstract available.

PMID:
12403532
8.

Scientific publishing. PNAS nixes special privileges for (most) papers.

Kean S.

Science. 2009 Sep 18;325(5947):1486-7. doi: 10.1126/science.325_1486b. No abstract available.

PMID:
19762615
9.

[Unnecessary work of the research ethics committees? A lot of work is done with studies which are never to be published].

Olofsson BO, Lynöe N, Mjörndal T.

Lakartidningen. 2000 Apr 19;97(16):1974-6. Swedish. No abstract available.

PMID:
10826358
10.

[Review of scientific papers: entitlement for a few; benefit for everybody].

Muccioli C, Campos M, Goldchmit M, Dantas PE, Bechara SJ, Costa VP.

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006 Jan-Feb;69(1):5. Epub 2006 Feb 10. Portuguese. No abstract available.

11.

Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.

Pearson H.

Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):490. No abstract available.

PMID:
15175712
12.

Bad papers by Caveman.

[No authors listed]

J Cell Sci. 2005 Mar 15;118(Pt 6):1103-4. No abstract available.

13.

Publishing in peer review journals--criteria for success.

McIntyre E, Eckermann SL, Keane M, Magarey A, Roeger L.

Aust Fam Physician. 2007 Jul;36(7):561-2.

14.

Getting published in peer-reviewed journals.

Dimitroulis G.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;40(12):1342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.11.012.

PMID:
22142552
15.

Hwang case review committee misses the mark.

Rossner M.

J Cell Biol. 2007 Jan 15;176(2):131-2. Epub 2007 Jan 8. No abstract available.

16.

Journal lotteries.

Cantor C.

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;32(6):887-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
10084356
17.

The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.

Walsh PJ, Mommsen TP, Nilsson GE.

Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;152(3):203-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Jan 29. No abstract available.

PMID:
19146976
18.

Scientific publishing. Half of all papers now free in some form, study claims.

Kaiser J.

Science. 2013 Aug 23;341(6148):830. doi: 10.1126/science.341.6148.830. No abstract available.

PMID:
23970674
19.

The value of peer review.

Dougherty MC.

Nurs Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;55(2):73-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
16601618
20.

To peer review or not to peer review: that seems to be the question.

Stanley RJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Nov;185(5):1101. No abstract available.

PMID:
16400751
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk