Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 197

1.

Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Derome P, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Malo M.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.033. Epub 2013 May 20.

PMID:
23702265
2.

Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.

Kamath AF, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 4;97(3):216-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00540.

PMID:
25653322
3.

Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.

Jensen CL, Winther N, Schrøder HM, Petersen MM.

Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

PMID:
25212989
4.

Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Schmitz HC, Klauser W, Citak M, Al-Khateeb H, Gehrke T, Kendoff D.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 May 8.

PMID:
23664075
5.

Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.

Villanueva-Martínez M, De la Torre-Escudero B, Rojo-Manaute JM, Ríos-Luna A, Chana-Rodriguez F.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):988-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.003. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

PMID:
23414934
6.

Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.

Howard JL, Kudera J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):478-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01322.

PMID:
21368080
7.

Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.

De Martino I, De Santis V, Sculco PK, D'Apolito R, Assini JB, Gasparini G.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3176-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4338-2. Epub 2015 May 13.

PMID:
25968895
8.

Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.

Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):78-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01495.

PMID:
18171960
9.

Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?

Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, Soileau ES, Vail TP.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1888-9.

10.

Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.

Rao BM, Kamal TT, Vafaye J, Moss M.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1069-74. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.29194.

PMID:
23908422
11.

Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schrøder HM, Lund B.

Int Orthop. 2012 Sep;36(9):1857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1601-y. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

12.

Tantalum cones and bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Boureau F, Putman S, Arnould A, Dereudre G, Migaud H, Pasquier G.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.020. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

13.

Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Long WJ, Scuderi GR.

J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

PMID:
18823749
14.

The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Brown NM, Bell JA, Jung EK, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Levine BR.

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.048. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

PMID:
26100475
15.

Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:104-12.

PMID:
16672879
16.

Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems.

Radnay CS, Scuderi GR.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:83-92. Review.

PMID:
16672876
17.

Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results.

Barnett SL, Mayer RR, Gondusky JS, Choi L, Patel JJ, Gorab RS.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.026. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

PMID:
24444570
18.

Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.

Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:131-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01061.

PMID:
19255205
19.

Results of revision total knee arthroplasty in the face of significant bone deficiency.

Rorabeck CH, Smith PN.

Orthop Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;29(2):361-71. Review.

PMID:
9553582
20.

The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Pulido L, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):34-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3585-y.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk