Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions.

Lee KY, Macfarlane DJ, Cerin E.

Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(3):332-9. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2011.643925. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

PMID:
23679150
2.

A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions.

Kaminsky LA, Ozemek C.

Physiol Meas. 2012 Nov;33(11):1869-76. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/11/1869. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

PMID:
23111061
3.
4.

Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.

Feito Y, Bassett DR, Thompson DL.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Apr;44(4):733-41. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182351913.

PMID:
21904249
5.

Validation of Physical Activity Tracking via Android Smartphones Compared to ActiGraph Accelerometer: Laboratory-Based and Free-Living Validation Studies.

Hekler EB, Buman MP, Grieco L, Rosenberger M, Winter SJ, Haskell W, King AC.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Apr 15;3(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3505.

6.
7.

Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.

Hänggi JM, Phillips LR, Rowlands AV.

J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Jan;16(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

PMID:
22749938
8.

Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.

McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1509-14.

PMID:
17805082
9.

Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running.

John D, Tyo B, Bassett DR.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Feb;42(2):368-74. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b3af49.

10.

Comparison of Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers under free-living conditions.

McClain JJ, Craig CL, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C.

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Aug;32(4):753-61.

PMID:
17622290
11.

Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.

Feito Y, Garner HR, Bassett DR.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jan;47(1):211-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000395.

PMID:
24870583
12.

Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls.

Sandroff BM, Motl RW.

Disabil Rehabil. 2013 May;35(9):725-31. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.707745.

PMID:
23557239
13.

Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents.

Corder K, Brage S, Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Wareham N, Ekelund U.

J Sports Sci. 2007 Dec;25(14):1607-11.

PMID:
17852668
14.

Comparative interinstrument reliability of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions.

Vanhelst J, Baquet G, Gottrand F, Béghin L.

Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Apr;114(2):584-94.

PMID:
22755462
15.

Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension.

Cain KL, Conway TL, Adams MA, Husak LE, Sallis JF.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Apr 25;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-51.

16.

Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions.

Vanhelst J, Mikulovic J, Bui-Xuan G, Dieu O, Blondeau T, Fardy P, Béghin L.

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Apr 25;5:187. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-187.

17.

Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women.

Kumahara H, Ayabe M, Ichibakase M, Tashima A, Chiwata M, Takashi T.

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 May;40(5):448-56. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0183. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

PMID:
25832964
18.

Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study.

Ojiambo R, Konstabel K, Veidebaum T, Reilly J, Verbestel V, Huybrechts I, Sioen I, Casajús JA, Moreno LA, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Bammann K, Tubic BM, Marild S, Westerterp K, Pitsiladis YP; IDEFICS Consortium.

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Nov;113(10):1530-6. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01290.2011. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

19.

Head-to-head comparison between Actigraph 7164 and GT1M accelerometers in adolescents.

Tanha T, Tornberg ÅB, Wollmer P, Dencker M.

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Mar;33(2):162-5. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12003. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

PMID:
23383695
20.

Comparison of Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers in 10-yr-old children.

McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Washington TL, Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Apr;39(4):630-8.

PMID:
17414800
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk