Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 146

1.

The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean.

Jeon HS, Nolan F.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):3039-49. doi: 10.1121/1.4798663.

PMID:
23654407
2.

Intonation as an encoder of speaker certainty: information and confirmation yes-no questions in Catalan.

Vanrell Mdel M, Mascaró I, Torres-Tamarit F, Prieto P.

Lang Speech. 2013 Jun;56(Pt 2):163-90.

PMID:
23905279
3.

Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.

Bhatara A, Boll-Avetisyan N, Unger A, Nazzi T, Höhle B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):3828-43. doi: 10.1121/1.4823848.

PMID:
24180792
4.

The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception.

Yu KM, Lam HW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Sep;136(3):1320. doi: 10.1121/1.4887462.

PMID:
25190405
5.

Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.

Kim S, Cho T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):EL19-25. doi: 10.1121/1.4807431.

PMID:
23862901
6.

Intonational structure as a word-boundary cue in Tokyo Japanese.

Warner N, Otake T, Arai T.

Lang Speech. 2010;53(Pt 1):107-31.

PMID:
20415004
7.

Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic information.

Nakai S, Turk AE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):966-76. doi: 10.1121/1.3514419.

PMID:
21361453
8.

Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.

Chandrasekaran B, Sampath PD, Wong PC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):456-65. doi: 10.1121/1.3445785.

9.

The effect of context duration on Mandarin listeners' tone normalization.

Luo X, Ashmore KB.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Aug;136(2):EL109-15. doi: 10.1121/1.4885483.

10.

Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.

Bishop J, Keating P.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1100-12. doi: 10.1121/1.4714351.

PMID:
22894229
11.

Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.

McAuliffe MJ, Gibson EM, Kerr SE, Anderson T, LaShell PJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1358-68. doi: 10.1121/1.4812764.

PMID:
23927132
12.

The role of tonal onglides in German nuclear pitch accents.

Ritter S, Grice M.

Lang Speech. 2015 Mar;58(Pt 1):114-28.

PMID:
25935940
13.

How listeners weight acoustic cues to intonational phrase boundaries.

Yang X, Shen X, Li W, Yang Y.

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102166. eCollection 2014.

14.

On-line perception of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3: evidence from eye movements.

Shen J, Deutsch D, Rayner K.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):3016-29. doi: 10.1121/1.4795775.

PMID:
23654405
15.

Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.

Sell G, Suied C, Elhilali M, Shamma S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):911-22. doi: 10.1121/1.4906826.

PMID:
25698023
16.

Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.

Jeng FC, Hu J, Dickman B, Lin CY, Lin CD, Wang CY, Chung HK, Li X.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Jan;50(1):14-26. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.515620. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

PMID:
21047294
17.

The perception of intonation questions and statements in Cantonese.

Ma JK, Ciocca V, Whitehill TL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):1012-23. doi: 10.1121/1.3531840.

PMID:
21361457
18.

Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.

Meyer BT, Brand T, Kollmeier B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):388-403. doi: 10.1121/1.3514525.

PMID:
21303019
19.

Just noticeable difference of tone pitch contour change for English- and Chinese-native listeners.

Liu C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):3011-20. doi: 10.1121/1.4820887.

PMID:
24116436
20.

Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naive English listeners.

Shport IA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul;138(1):307-18. doi: 10.1121/1.4922468.

PMID:
26233031
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk