Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 205

1.

Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.

Chen J, Baer T, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):2910-20. doi: 10.1121/1.4799807.

PMID:
23654396
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):3029-38. doi: 10.1121/1.4820893.

PMID:
24116438
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
3.

Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.

Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1718-31. doi: 10.1121/1.4739441.

PMID:
22978899
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Effect of enhancement of spectral changes on speech intelligibility and clarity preferences for the hearing impaired.

Chen J, Baer T, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):2987-98. doi: 10.1121/1.3689556.

PMID:
22501075
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.

Suelzle D, Parsa V, Falk TH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):EL412-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4802186.

PMID:
23656102
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.

Parsa V, Scollie S, Glista D, Seelisch A.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):54-68. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480856.

PMID:
23539261
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.

Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23396271
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.

Sabin AT, Souza PE.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):94-107. doi: 10.1177/1084713813495981.

PMID:
24028890
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
9.

Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Kim G, Loizou PC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1581-96. doi: 10.1121/1.3619790.

PMID:
21895096
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
10.

Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1419-32. doi: 10.1121/1.4864786.

PMID:
24606279
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Srinivasan AG, Padilla M, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM.

Hear Res. 2013 May;299:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

PMID:
23467170
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment.

Lovett R, Summerfield Q, Vickers D.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):377-84. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.769064. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

PMID:
23516964
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Two-microphone spatial filtering improves speech reception for cochlear-implant users in reverberant conditions with multiple noise sources.

Goldsworthy RL.

Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 20;18. pii: 2331216514555489. doi: 10.1177/2331216514555489.

PMID:
25330772
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.

Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.

Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 13;18. pii: 2331216514553783. doi: 10.1177/2331216514553783.

PMID:
25315376
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.

Keidser G, Dillon H, Mejia J, Nguyen CV.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):795-800. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.817688. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

PMID:
23957444
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired.

Stone MA, Anton K, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1141-51. doi: 10.1121/1.4733543.

PMID:
22894233
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).

Arweiler I, Buchholz JM, Dau T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):13-6. doi: 10.1121/1.4770249.

PMID:
23297878
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.

Ng EH, Rudner M, Lunner T, Pedersen MS, Rönnberg J.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):433-41. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

PMID:
23550584
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment.

Sullivan JR, Thibodeau LM, Assmann PF.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):495-501. doi: 10.1121/1.4770247.

PMID:
23297921
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):342-59. doi: 10.1121/1.3436522. Erratum in: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3253.

PMID:
20649229
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk