Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 110

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 23654395)

1.

Target identification using relative level in multi-talker listening.

Kitterick PT, Clarke E, O'Shea C, Seymour J, Summerfield AQ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):2899-909. doi: 10.1121/1.4799810.

PMID:
23654395
2.

Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening.

Kitterick PT, Bailey PJ, Summerfield AQ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2498-508. doi: 10.1121/1.3327507.

PMID:
20370032
4.

Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Allen K, Alais D, Shinn-Cunningham B, Carlile S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2043-53. doi: 10.1121/1.3631666.

5.

Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E.

Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):3-14. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825e2841.

6.

Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?

Ben-David BM, Tse VY, Schneider BA.

Hear Res. 2012 Aug;290(1-2):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.022. Epub 2012 May 16.

PMID:
22609772
7.

Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.

Summers V, Molis MR.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Apr;47(2):245-56.

PMID:
15157127
8.

The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.

Zekveld AA, Rudner M, Johnsrude IS, Rönnberg J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Sep;134(3):2225-34. doi: 10.1121/1.4817926.

PMID:
23967952
9.

Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Nov;110(5 Pt 1):2527-38.

PMID:
11757942
10.

Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.

Allen K, Carlile S, Alais D.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Mar;123(3):1562-70. doi: 10.1121/1.2831774.

PMID:
18345844
11.

Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.

Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1627-37. doi: 10.1121/1.2951964.

12.

Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.

Collin B, Lavandier M.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1146-59. doi: 10.1121/1.4812248.

PMID:
23927114
13.
14.

Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.

Rosen S, Souza P, Ekelund C, Majeed AA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr;133(4):2431-43. doi: 10.1121/1.4794379.

15.

Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 May;115(5 Pt 1):2246-56.

PMID:
15139635
16.

English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.

Mi L, Tao S, Wang W, Dong Q, Jin SH, Liu C.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):EL391-7. doi: 10.1121/1.4800191.

PMID:
23656099
17.

Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.

Balakrishnan U, Freyman RL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 May;123(5):2680-91. doi: 10.1121/1.2902176.

18.

Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.

Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):2998-10. doi: 10.1121/1.3479547.

PMID:
21110595
19.

Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Helfer KS, Chevalier J, Freyman RL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Dec;128(6):3625-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3502462.

20.

Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.

Deroche ML, Culling JF.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):EL465-70. doi: 10.1121/1.4826152.

PMID:
24181992
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk